The costs of production of alternative jet fuel: A harmonized stochastic assessment. (March 2017)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Bann, Seamus J.; Malina, Robert; Staples, Mark D.; Suresh, Pooja; Pearlson, Matthew; Tyner, Wallace E.; Hileman, James I.; Barrett, Steven
• Is Part Of: Bioresource technology. Volume 227(2017)
• Page Start: 179
• Page End: 187
• Publication Date: 2017-03
• Subjects: Alternative jet fuel -- Techno-economic analysis -- Monte-Carlo simulation -- United States alternative fuel policy -- Renewable Fuel Standard; Biomass -- Periodicals; Biomass energy -- Periodicals; Bioremediation -- Periodicals; Agricultural wastes -- Periodicals; Factory and trade waste -- Periodicals; Organic wastes -- Periodicals; Bioénergie -- Périodiques; Déchets agricoles -- Périodiques; Déchets industriels -- Périodiques; Déchets organiques -- Périodiques; Déchets (Combustible) -- Périodiques; 662.88
• DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2016.12.032
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0960-8524

Abstract

Graphical abstract: Highlights: Six alternative jet production pathways were modeled using harmonized assumptions. Technical and economic uncertainty was described with probability distributions. The economic viability of each pathway was assessed using Monte Carlo simulations. Mean prices are higher than for conventional jet fuel without policy incentives. Economic viability rises when considering different U.S. alternative fuel policies. Abstract: This study quantifies and compares the costs of production for six alternative jet fuel pathways using consistent financial and technical assumptions. Uncertainty was propagated through the analysis using Monte Carlo simulations. The six processes assessed were HEFA, advanced fermentation, Fischer-Tropsch, aqueous phase processing, hydrothermal liquefaction, and fast pyrolysis. The results indicate that none of the six processes would be profitable in the absence of government incentives, with HEFA using yellow grease, HEFA using tallow, and FT revealing the lowest mean jet fuel prices at $0.91/liter ($0.66/liter–$1.24/liter), $1.06/liter ($0.79/liter–$1.42/liter), and $1.15/liter ($0.95/liter–$1.39/liter), respectively. This study also quantifies plant performance in the United States with a Renewable Fuel Standard policy analysis. Results indicate that some pathways could achieve positive NPV with relatively high likelihood under existing policy supports, with HEFA and FPH revealing the highest probability of positive NPV at 94.9% and 99.7%, respectively, in the best-case scenario.