Novel educational interventions in residency increase knowledge of chronic liver disease and career interest in hepatology. Issue 6 (1st October 2016)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Mikolajczyk, Adam E.; Farnan, Jeanne M.; McConville, John F.; Jensen, Donald M.; Reddy, K. Gautham; Te, Helen S.; Reau, Nancy; Aronsohn, Andrew I.
• Is Part Of: Hepatology. Volume 64:Issue 6(2016:Dec.)
• Page Start: 2210
• Page End: 2218
• Publication Date: 2016-10-01
• Subjects: Heart -- Diseases -- Nursing -- Periodicals; Lungs -- Diseases -- Nursing -- Periodicals; Intensive care nursing -- Periodicals; Foie -- Maladies -- Périodiques; 616.362
• DOI: 10.1002/hep.28741
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0270-9139

Abstract

Abstract : There is an increasing burden of chronic liver disease (CLD) in the United States but a significant shortage of hepatologists. Thus, it is necessary to develop new recruitment strategies to the field of hepatology as well as ensure that non‐gastroenterology‐trained physicians are able to capably assist in the care of CLD. We established a novel, nonelective, inpatient hepatology rotation that uses required modules in the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases Curriculum and Training‐First Hepatitis B and C curriculums as well as in Liver Learning . A paper‐based anonymous assessment was distributed to the inaugural 25 postgraduate years 2 and 3 internal medicine residents before and after the 2‐week rotation over the course of 1 year. Both the prerotation and postrotation assessments included validated multiple‐choice questions and Likert‐type questions, which evaluated self‐perceived knowledge and comfort with managing CLD. The mean comfort level (1 = not at all comfortable/strongly disagree, 5 = very comfortable/strongly agree) of managing several common liver diseases increased significantly after completion of the rotation (i.e., cirrhosis 2.8 versus 3.8, P < 0.001; hepatitis B 2.4 versus 3.4, P = 0.001; hepatitis C 2.6 versus 3.7, P = 0.002; nonalcoholic steatohepatitis 3.0 versus 4.0, P < 0.001; liver transplant care 2.1 versus 3.4, P < 0.001). There was also a significantly increased interest in hepatology as a career (2.6 versus 3.0, P = 0.03). Finally, the mean percentage of multiple‐choice questions answered correctly on the pretest was 62% and posttest was 77% ( P = 0.02). Conclusion : Our novel curriculum and nonelective hepatology rotation has effectively demonstrated improvement in internal medicine residents' comfort with and knowledge of CLD, and increased career interest in hepatology was also observed after completion of the curriculum, which suggests that more exposure to CLD could positively impact recruitment to the workforce; larger, multicenter studies are needed to validate these results. (Hepatology 2016;64:2210‐2218).