Exploring greenhouse gas reduction opportunities for retailers in Fast Moving Consumer Goods distribution networks. (January 2017)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Igl, Johannes; Kellner, Florian
• Is Part Of: Transportation research. Volume 50(2017)
• Page Start: 55
• Page End: 69
• Publication Date: 2017-01
• Subjects: Greenhouse gas (GHG)/CO2 network analysis -- Network carbon footprint -- Fast Moving Consumer Goods (FMCG) -- Distribution network analysis -- Retailer -- Distribution logistics; Transportation -- Research -- Periodicals; Transportation -- Environmental aspects -- Periodicals; 354.76
• DOI: 10.1016/j.trd.2016.10.008
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1361-9209

Abstract

Highlights: The impact of retailer behavior on GHG emissions from distribution is quantified. 150 distribution network carbon footprints are determined in a quantitative model. A real-world shipment structure is modified to optimize environmental performance. Bundling shipments to (bi)weekly delivery frequencies saves most GHG emissions. Introducing minimum order quantities also improves the network GHG performance. Abstract: This research explores logistics-related leverages in the responsibility of retailers for improving the environmental performance of a Fast Moving Consumer Goods (FMCG) distribution network. We examine opportunities for modifying the network carbon footprint by changing network design variables. To do so, a quantitative distribution network model is established, and 150 scenarios are calculated by modifying real-world shipment data from an existing multinational FMCG manufacturer. Four distribution variables are identified for a many-to-many and a hub-and-spoke network structure. Two variables affect the distribution network and two interfere in the shipment structure by manipulating weight and/or the delivery date. This research sheds light on the extent of the changes in greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions of the distribution network that result from modifications in the logistics variables. The greatest effect on the quantity of GHG emissions can be observed when an anticipation horizon for orders is introduced. When shipments are consolidated and delivered only weekly or biweekly from the manufacturer to the retailers, GHG emissions drop significantly. Another opportunity for retailers to cut down GHG emissions is based on the concept of minimum order quantities where shipments to a retailer location are bundled until a certain weight is reached. Additionally, total GHG emissions of distribution may be reduced by raising the tonnage limit, thereby triggering direct shipments between the manufacturer's facilities and the retailer locations, or by raising the tonnage limit, which triggers direct shipments in the logistics service provider network. The extent of GHG reduction is assessed for all investigated variables.