The motility of esophageal sphincters during liquid and solid bolus swallows: a multicenter normative value study of high‐resolution manometry in China. Issue 1 (25th September 2016)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Xiang, X.‐L.; Wang, A.; Tu, L.; Ke, M.‐Y.; Yang, Y.‐S.; Jiang, B.; Lin, L.; Dai, N.; Zhang, S.‐S.; Tao, L.; Xu, H.; Liang, X.‐M.; Fang, X.‐C.; Xia, Z.‐W.; Wang, X.; Wu, J.‐N.; Wang, M.‐F.; Zhang, H.‐J.; Fang, Y.‐F.; Shen, C.; Wang, J.; Peng, L.‐H.; Li, W.‐Y.; Wang, Z.‐F.; Wang, K.; Liu, N.; Hou, X.‐H.
• Is Part Of: Neurogastroenterology & motility. Volume 29:Issue 1(2017)
• Page Start: n/a
• Page End: n/a
• Publication Date: 2016-09-25
• Subjects: bolus type -- esophageal sphincters -- HRM -- normal values; Gastrointestinal system -- Motility -- Periodicals; Gastrointestinal system -- Innervation -- Periodicals; 616.33
• DOI: 10.1111/nmo.12914
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1350-1925

Abstract

Abstract: Background: It is gradually accepted that solid bolus swallow needs to be added to the procedure of manometry. The motility differences in the upper esophageal sphincter (UES) and lower esophageal sphincter (LES) were not well described. Sierra Scientific Instruments solid‐state high‐resolution manometry (HRM) system, the most popular HRM system in China, lacks the Chinese normative values for both liquid and solid bolus swallow parameters. Methods: The esophageal HRM data of 88 healthy volunteers were analyzed. The parameters of both sphincters in resting stage were summarized and those during solid and liquid swallows were compared. Key Results: Normative HRM values of sphincter parameters in solid and liquid bolus swallows in China were established. The UES residual pressure of solid bolus swallows was lower than that of liquid bolus (0.3±5.5 mm Hg vs 4.8±5.9 mm Hg, P =.000). The time parameters of UES relaxation between two types of bolus swallows were similar. In solid bolus swallows, the intrabolus pressure (IBP) (13.8±5.1 mm Hg vs 10.9±5.7 mm Hg, P =.000) and LES relaxation time (11.0±2.1 seconds vs 8.7±1.3 seconds, P =.000) were higher. The 4‐second integrated relaxation pressure between both bolus swallows was similar. Conclusions & Inferences: The function of the UES and LES between solid and liquid bolus swallows is different. Chinese HRM parameters are different from the Chicago Classification (http://www.chictr.org.cn, Number ChiCTR‐EOC‐15007147). Abstract : This study demonstrated the motility differences between solid and liquid bolus swallows for both the UES and LES. It confirms the application of HRM with solid swallows. More importantly, this study provides the normative values for both liquid and solid bolus swallows of Sierra Scientific Instruments solid‐state HRM system for Chinese population.