Learning to select and apply qualitative and participatory methods in natural resource management research: self-critical assessment of research in Cameroon. Issue 1 (2nd January 2017)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Learning to select and apply qualitative and participatory methods in natural resource management research: self-critical assessment of research in Cameroon. Issue 1 (2nd January 2017)
- Main Title:
- Learning to select and apply qualitative and participatory methods in natural resource management research: self-critical assessment of research in Cameroon
- Authors:
- Nchanji, Yvonne Kiki
Levang, Patrice
Jalonen, Riina - Abstract:
- Abstract: Biophysical scientists are increasingly interested in undertaking research on natural resources management from a social science perspective. This, however, requires at least a basic understanding of the different social science approaches and the philosophical perspectives underlying them. We present a meta-analysis of a researcher's experience when applying qualitative and participatory research methods for the first time, and reflect on the challenges and lessons learned that could help other aspiring researchers in conducting research with such methods. We compare researcher's experiences with a quantitative research tool (household surveys) and qualitative non-participatory (focus group discussions) and participatory tools (seasonal activity calendars and access and control matrices) used in a gender-responsive forestry study in Cameroon. The field research included almost 50 gender- and age-disaggregated group sessions. Based on the meta-analysis of the research process, we identified key factors affecting the perceived ease of eliciting and interpreting information with different types of social research tools: specificity and acceptance of a tool, ease of managing social dynamics and maintaining focus during data collection, and subjectivity and comparability during data analysis and interpretation. Developing skills in participatory research from research design to group facilitation and balanced interpretation of findings require considerable time and isAbstract: Biophysical scientists are increasingly interested in undertaking research on natural resources management from a social science perspective. This, however, requires at least a basic understanding of the different social science approaches and the philosophical perspectives underlying them. We present a meta-analysis of a researcher's experience when applying qualitative and participatory research methods for the first time, and reflect on the challenges and lessons learned that could help other aspiring researchers in conducting research with such methods. We compare researcher's experiences with a quantitative research tool (household surveys) and qualitative non-participatory (focus group discussions) and participatory tools (seasonal activity calendars and access and control matrices) used in a gender-responsive forestry study in Cameroon. The field research included almost 50 gender- and age-disaggregated group sessions. Based on the meta-analysis of the research process, we identified key factors affecting the perceived ease of eliciting and interpreting information with different types of social research tools: specificity and acceptance of a tool, ease of managing social dynamics and maintaining focus during data collection, and subjectivity and comparability during data analysis and interpretation. Developing skills in participatory research from research design to group facilitation and balanced interpretation of findings require considerable time and is often best learned through apprenticeship. We explore how experience gained through the use of participatory research tools and reflection will help in applying such tools better, improving interaction with research participants and increasing relevance of research results. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Forests, trees and livelihoods. Volume 26:Issue 1(2017)
- Journal:
- Forests, trees and livelihoods
- Issue:
- Volume 26:Issue 1(2017)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 26, Issue 1 (2017)
- Year:
- 2017
- Volume:
- 26
- Issue:
- 1
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2017-0026-0001-0000
- Page Start:
- 47
- Page End:
- 64
- Publication Date:
- 2017-01-02
- Subjects:
- Gender -- natural resource management -- participatory research methods -- household surveys -- focus group discussions -- interdisciplinary research -- research design
Agroforestry -- Periodicals
Forest management -- Social aspects -- Periodicals
Agroforesterie -- Périodiques
Forêts -- Gestion -- Aspect social -- Périodiques
634.9 - Journal URLs:
- http://www.tandfonline.com/loi/tftl20 ↗
http://www.tandfonline.com/toc/tftl20/current ↗
http://www.tandfonline.com/ ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1080/14728028.2016.1246980 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 1472-8028
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 127.xml