European Roe Deer Increase Vigilance When Faced with Immediate Predation Risk by Eurasian Lynx. (1st October 2015)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Eccard, Jana A.; Meißner, Jessica K.; Heurich, Marco
• Editors: Herberstein, M.
• Is Part Of: Ethology. Volume 123:Number 1(2017)
• Page Start: 30
• Page End: 40
• Publication Date: 2015-10-01
• Subjects: antipredatory behaviour -- landscape of fear -- predation risk -- predator -- risk allocation -- risk uniformity; Animal behavior -- Periodicals; 591.5
• DOI: 10.1111/eth.12420
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0179-1613

Abstract

Abstract: Prey animals must balance antipredatory behaviour with foraging behaviour. According to the risk allocation hypothesis, prey increase antipredatory behaviour and reduce foraging activity during pulses of high risk, but with continuous risk, other activities must continue and antipredatory behaviour decreases despite the risk. We studied the impact of lynx presence on the vigilance behaviour of wild roe deer under conditions of (i) a pulsed elevated risk by experimentally spreading lynx urine as an olfactory cue, and (ii) continuous risk by comparing an area where lynx was eradicated 160 years ago to an area where lynx has been re‐introduced 30 years ago. Roe deer were extremely vigilant in response to the predator olfactory cue; however, roe deer vigilance did not differ measurably among areas with or without potential lynx presence. Deer were more vigilant before sunset than during the night at both study areas, probably due to long‐term adaptation of roe deer to human hunting during daytime. Vigilance decreased from August to September even though activity of lynx increases in autumn, which may be a result either of increased foraging due to decrease in food quality in autumn, or of changes in social organization of the deer. Our results suggested that the degree of vigilance depends on environmental cues. We found that roe deer respond to lynx urine despite a long absence of lynx in the ecosystem. Our results support the risk allocation hypothesis for responses to pulses of high risk but not for responses to continuous elevated levels of risk.