Tangential intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) to the intact breast. Issue 4 (18th July 2016)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Dean, Jenna; Hansen, Carmen J.; Westhuyzen, Justin; Waller, Brett; Turnbull, Kirsty; Wood, Maree; Last, Andrew
• Is Part Of: Journal of medical radiation sciences. Volume 63:Issue 4(2016:Dec.)
• Page Start: 217
• Page End: 223
• Publication Date: 2016-07-18
• Subjects: Breast cancer -- intensity modulated radiotherapy -- radiotherapy -- radiotherapy planning; Radiology, Medical -- Periodicals; Radiology, Medical -- Australia -- Periodicals; Radiology, Medical -- New Zealand -- Periodicals; Radiotherapy -- Periodicals; Diagnostic imaging -- Periodicals; 616
• DOI: 10.1002/jmrs.185
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 2051-3895

Abstract

Abstract: Introduction: Inverse‐planned intensity modulated radiation therapy (IP‐IMRT) has potential benefits over other techniques for tangential intact breast radiotherapy. Possible benefits include increased homogeneity, faster planning time, less inter‐planner variability and lower doses to organs at risk (OAR). We therefore conducted a pilot study of previously treated intact breast patients to compare the current forward‐planned 'field‐in‐field' technique (FP‐IMRT) with an IP‐IMRT alternative. Methods: The IP‐IMRT plans of 20 patients were generated from a template created for the planning system. All patients were prescribed adjuvant whole breast radiotherapy using a hypofractionated regimen of 40.05 Gy in 15 fractions over 3 weeks. Plans were assessed based on visual inspection of coverage as well as statistical analysis and compared to the clinically acceptable FP‐IMRT plans. Patients were planned retrospectively in Monaco 3.2 ® using a laterality‐specific, tangential planning template. Minor adjustments were made as necessary to meet the planning criteria in the protocol. Dose coverage, maximums, homogeneity indices and doses to OAR were recorded. Results: The IP‐IMRT plans provided more consistent coverage (38.18 Gy vs. 36.08 Gy of D95; P = 0.005), a comparable though higher average maximum (D2 = 42.52 Gy vs. 42.08 Gy; P = 0.0001), more homogeneous plans (homogeneity index = 0.908 vs. 0.861; P = 0.01) and somewhat lower V20 heart and lung doses (0.11% vs. 0.89% for heart; 5.4% vs. 7.52% for lung) than FP‐IMRT ( P > 0.05). Conclusion: Clinically acceptable plans have been generated using the IP‐IMRT templates in Monaco. Improvements in consistency and quality were seen when compared to the FP‐IMRT plans. The template‐based process is an efficient method to inversely plan IMRT for breast patients. Abstract : Inverse‐planned intensity modulated radiation therapy (IP‐IMRT) has potential benefits over other techniques for tangential intact breast radiotherapy. Possible benefits include increased homogeneity, faster planning time, less inter‐planner variability and lower doses to organs at risk. We therefore conducted a pilot study of previously treated intact breast patients to compare the current forward‐planned 'field‐in‐field' technique (FP‐IMRT) with an IP‐IMRT alternative.