Metric-based BIM implementation assessment: a review of research and practice. (2nd January 2017)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Abdirad, Hamid
• Is Part Of: Architectural engineering and design management. Volume 13:Number 1(2017)
• Page Start: 52
• Page End: 78
• Publication Date: 2017-01-02
• Subjects: BIM assessment -- BIM implementation -- criteria -- metrics -- performance; Building -- Periodicals; Architectural design -- Periodicals; Construction industry -- Management -- Periodicals; 720
• DOI: 10.1080/17452007.2016.1183474
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1745-2007

Abstract

ABSTRACT: Building information modeling (BIM) is one of the most significant developments in the construction industry, as it introduces new technologies, processes, and interactions into practice. Prior research shows that there is an increasing interest among practitioners and academics to assess maturity, productivity, and performance of BIM implementation. This suggests that as BIM adoption grows, the need for BIM implementation assessment arises to facilitate monitoring, measuring, and improving BIM practices. However, so far, no single study has comprehensively reviewed and reported the existing approaches, metrics, and criteria used for assessing BIM practices. This study aims to review and analyze the literature and synthesize existing knowledge relevant to the topic. The author develops a thematic framework of BIM aspects, BIM goals, and performance evaluation trends to define grounds for assessing BIM implementation. Based on the framework, this research analyzed a total number of 97 references (selected out of 322 studies) to identify, extract, and classify metrics/criteria used for assessing BIM implementation. This study has practical implications for developing future BIM maturity models and BIM assessment tools as it synthesizes the existing developments on this topic, highlights gaps and limitations in metric-based BIM assessment, and provides recommendations for further research and developments.