Growth Curve Modeling to Studying Change: A Comparison of Approaches Using Longitudinal Dyadic Data With Distinguishable Dyads. Issue 1 (2nd January 2017)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Planalp, Elizabeth M.; Du, Han; Braungart-Rieker, Julie M.; Wang, Lijuan
• Is Part Of: Structural equation modeling. Volume 24:Issue 1(2017)
• Page Start: 129
• Page End: 147
• Publication Date: 2017-01-02
• Subjects: longitudinal dyadic data analysis -- multilevel modeling -- separate modeling -- simultaneous modeling -- structural equation modeling; Multivariate analysis -- Periodicals; Social sciences -- Statistical methods -- Periodicals; 519.535
• DOI: 10.1080/10705511.2016.1224088
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1070-5511

Abstract

Abstract : Although methodology articles have increasingly emphasized the need to analyze data from two members of a dyad simultaneously, the most popular method in substantive applications is to examine dyad members separately. This might be due to the underappreciation of the extra information simultaneous modeling strategies can provide. Therefore, the goal of this study was to compare multiple growth curve modeling approaches for longitudinal dyadic data (LDD) in both structural equation modeling and multilevel modeling frameworks. Models separately assessing change over time for distinguishable dyad members are compared to simultaneous models fitted to LDD from both dyad members. Furthermore, we compared the simultaneous default versus dependent approaches (whether dyad pairs' Level 1 [or unique] residuals are allowed to covary and differ in variance). Results indicated that estimates of variance and covariance components led to conflicting results. We recommend the simultaneous dependent approach for inferring differences in change over time within a dyad.