Parliamentary Opposition Under Hybrid Regimes: Evidence from Egypt. Issue 4 (4th July 2016)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Loidolt, Bryce; Mecham, Quinn
• Is Part Of: Legislative studies quarterly. Volume 41:Issue 4(2016:Nov.)
• Page Start: 997
• Page End: 1022
• Publication Date: 2016-07-04
• Subjects: Legislative bodies -- Periodicals; Parlement; Procédure législative; Système parlementaire; Étude comparée (Descripteur de forme); Périodique électronique (Descripteur de forme); Ressource Internet (Descripteur de forme); 328
• DOI: 10.1111/lsq.12144
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0362-9805

Abstract

Abstract : Why do opposition political parties choose to run for parliament in semiauthoritarian systems? Existing literature emphasizes the benefits that these parties derive from campaigning and running for elections, while paying little attention to the politics that occurs within legislative institutions under these regimes. Supplementing election‐centric theories, we argue that opposition actors in semiauthoritarian systems also benefit directly from serving in weak parliaments and that this helps explain their participation in biased elections. We demonstrate this by examining the Muslim Brotherhood's legislative performance in Mubarak's Egypt, highlighting the mechanisms through which it used its minority presence in parliament to its advantage.