An endogenous theory of property rights: opening the black box of institutions. Issue 6 (1st November 2016)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Ho, Peter
• Is Part Of: Journal of peasant studies. Volume 43:Issue 6(2016)
• Page Start: 1121
• Page End: 1144
• Publication Date: 2016-11-01
• Subjects: development theory -- disequilibrium -- social welfare -- labor and capital -- power and conflict; Peasantry -- Periodicals; Sociology, Rural -- Periodicals; Rural development -- Periodicals; 305.563305
• DOI: 10.1080/03066150.2016.1253560
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0306-6150

Abstract

Abstract : From a neo-liberal paradigm, secure, formal and private property rights are crucial to foster sustained development. From this follows that institutions that fail to respond to shifting socio-economic opportunities are pushed to new arrangements. The enigma is posed by developments on the ground. Why would the removal of authoritarian institutions during the Arab Spring or Iraq war not increase market efficiency but rather cause the reverse, while China and India, despite persisting insecure, informal and common institutions, featured sustained growth? This collection posits that understanding these paradoxes requires a refocusing from form to function, detached from normative assumptions about institutional appearance. In so doing, three things are accomplished. First, starting from case studies on land, it is ascertained that the argument can be meaningfully extended to labor, capital and beyond. Second, the argument validates the 'credibility thesis' – that is, once institutions persist, they fulfill a function. Third, the collection studies 'development, broadly construed', by including the modes of production and beyond, the rural and urban, the developed and developing. This is why it reviews property rights from China to India, and from Mexico to Malaysia, covering issues such as customary rights, mining and pastoralism, but also state-owned banks, trade unions and notaries.