Dimethylphosphinate bridged binuclear Rh(i) catalysts for the alkoxycarbonylation of aromatic C–H bonds. Issue 42 (3rd October 2016)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Iturmendi, Amaia; Sanz Miguel, Pablo J.; Popoola, Saheed A.; Al-Saadi, Abdulaziz A.; Iglesias, Manuel; Oro, Luis A.
• Is Part Of: Dalton transactions. Volume 45:Issue 42(2016)
• Page Start: 16955
• Page End: 16965
• Publication Date: 2016-10-03
• Subjects: Chemistry, Inorganic -- Periodicals; Chemistry, Physical and theoretical -- Periodicals; Chemistry, Inorganic -- Periodicals; 546.05
• DOI: 10.1039/c6dt03010f
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1477-9226

Abstract

Abstract : A variety of binuclear rhodium(i ) complexes featuring two bridging dimethylphosphinate ligands ((CH3 )2 PO2 − ) have been prepared and tested in the alkoxycarbonylation of aromatic C–H bonds. Abstract : A variety of binuclear rhodium(i ) complexes featuring two bridging dimethylphosphinate ligands ((CH3 )2 PO2 − ) have been prepared and tested in the alkoxycarbonylation of aromatic C–H bonds. The complex [Rh(μ-κO, O′-(CH3 )2 PO2 )(cod)]2 has been prepared by a reaction of [Rh(μ-MeO)(cod)]2 with 2 equivalents of dimethylphosphinic acid. Binuclear complexes [Rh(μ-κO, O′-(CH3 )2 PO2 )(CO)L]2 (L = PPh3, P(OMe)Ph2 and P(OPh)3 ) were obtained by carbonylation of the related mononuclear complexes [Rh(κO-(CH3 )2 PO2 )(cod)(L)], which were prepared in situ by the reaction of [Rh(μ-κO, O′-(CH3 )2 PO2 )(cod)]2 with 2 equivalents of L. Conversely, if L = IPr, the reaction of [Rh(μ-κO, O′-(CH3 )2 PO2 )(CO)L]2 with carbon monoxide affords the mononuclear complex [Rh(κO-(CH3 )2 PO2 )(CO)2 IPr]. The subsequent reaction with trimethylamine N -oxide gives the corresponding binuclear complex [Rh(μ-κO, O′-(CH3 )2 PO2 )(CO)(IPr)]2 by abstraction of one of the carbonyl ligands. Complexes [Rh(μ-κO, O′-(CH3 )2 PO2 )(cod)]2 and [Rh(κO-(CH3 )2 PO2 )(cod)(L)] (L = IPr, PPh3, P(OMe)Ph2, P(OPh)3 ) are active precatalysts in the alkoxycarbonylation of C–H bonds, with the ligand system playing a key role in the catalytic activity. The complexes that feature more labile Rh–L bonds give rise to better catalysts, probably due to the more straightforward substitution of L by a second carbonyl ligand, since a more electrophilic carbonyl carbon atom is more susceptible toward aryl migration. In fact, complexes [Rh(μ-κO, O′-(CH3 )2 PO2 )(CO)2 ]2 and [Rh(μ-Cl)(CO)2 ]2, generated in situ from [Rh(μ-κO, O′-(CH3 )2 PO2 )(cod)]2 and [Rh(μ-Cl)(cod)2 ]2, respectively, are the most active catalysts tested in this work.