The diagnostic value of time-resolved MR angiography with Gadobutrol at 3 T for preoperative evaluation of lower extremity tumors: Comparison with computed tomography angiography. (2016)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Wu, Gang; Jin, Teng; Li, Ting; Li, Xiaoming
• Is Part Of: European journal of radiology open. Volume 3(2016)
• Page Start: 239
• Page End: 244
• Publication Date: 2016
• Subjects: TWIST time resolved magnetic resonance angiography with interleaved stochastic trajectory -- CTA computed tomography angiography -- AVF arterio-venous fistulae; Time-resolved -- Magnetic resonance angiography -- Lower extremity -- Tumors; Medical radiology -- Periodicals; 616.075705
• DOI: 10.1016/j.ejro.2016.08.006
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 2352-0477

Abstract

Abstract: Purpose: To evaluate the diagnostic value of time resolved magnetic resonance angiography with interleaved stochastic trajectory (TWIST) using Gadobutrol for preoperative evaluation of lower extremity tumors. Materials and methods: This prospective study was approved by the local Institutional Review Board. 50 consecutive patients (31 men, 19 women, age range 18–80 years, average age 42.7 years) with lower extremity tumors underwent TWIST and computed tomography angiography (CTA). Image quality of TWIST and CTA were evaluated by two radiologists according to a 4-point scale. The degree of arterial stenosis caused by tumor was assessed using TWSIT and CTA separately, and the intra-modality agreement was determined using a kappa test. The number of feeding arteries identified by TWIST was compared with that by CTA using Wilcoxon signed rank test. The ability to identify arterio-venous fistulae (AVF) were compared using a chi-square test. Results: Image quality of TWIST and CTA were rated as 3.88 ± 0.37 and 3.97 ± 0.16, without statistically significant difference (P = 0.135). Intra-modality agreement was excellent for the assessment of arterial stenosis (kappa = 0.806 ± 0.073 for Reader 1, kappa = 0.805 ± 0.073 for Reader 2). Readers identified AVF with TWIST in 27 of 50 cases, and identified AVF with CTA in 14 of 50 (P < 0.001). Mean feeding arteries identified with TWIST was significantly more than that with CTA (2.08 ± 1.72 vs 1.62 ± 1.52, P = 0.02). Conclusion: TWIST is a reliable imaging modality for the assessment of lower extremity tumors. TWIST is comparable to CTA for the identification of AVF and feeding arteries.