A study of the impact of individual thermal control on user comfort in the workplace: Norwegian cellular vs. British open plan offices. (2nd January 2017)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Shahzad, Sally; Brennan, John; Theodossopoulos, Dimitris; Hughes, Ben; Calautit, John Kaiser
• Is Part Of: Architectural science review. Volume 60:Number 1(2017)
• Page Start: 49
• Page End: 61
• Publication Date: 2017-01-02
• Subjects: Thermal comfort -- energy -- individual control -- personal office -- open plan workplace; Architecture -- Periodicals; Building -- Periodicals; Engineering -- Periodicals; 720.5
• DOI: 10.1080/00038628.2016.1235544
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0003-8628

Abstract

ABSTRACT: In modern offices, user control is being replaced by centrally operated thermal systems, and in Scandinavia, personal offices by open plan layouts. This study examined the impact of user control on thermal comfort and satisfaction. It compared a workplace, which was designed entirely based on individual control over the thermal environment, to an environment that limited thermal control was provided as a secondary option for fine-tuning: Norwegian cellular and British open plan offices. The Norwegian approach provided each user with control over a window, door, blinds, heating and cooling as the main thermal control system. In contrast, the British practice provided a uniform thermal environment with limited openable windows and blinds to refine the thermal environment for occupants seated around the perimeter of the building. Field studies of thermal comfort were applied to measure users' perception of thermal environment, empirical building performance and thermal control. The results showed a 30% higher satisfaction and 18% higher comfort level in the Norwegian offices compared to the British practices. However, the energy consumption of the Norwegian case studies was much higher compared to the British ones. A balance is required between energy efficiency and user thermal comfort in the workplace.