Comparison of source apportionment of PM2.5 using receptor models in the main hub port city of East Asia: Busan. (January 2017)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Jeong, Ju-Hee; Shon, Zang-Ho; Kang, Minsung; Song, Sang-Keun; Kim, Yoo-Keun; Park, Jinsoo; Kim, Hyunjae
• Is Part Of: Atmospheric environment. Volume 148(2017)
• Page Start: 115
• Page End: 127
• Publication Date: 2017-01
• Subjects: Receptor modeling -- PM2.5 -- PCA/APCS -- PMF -- CMB -- PSCF -- CWT -- Busan; Air -- Pollution -- Periodicals; Air -- Pollution -- Meteorological aspects -- Periodicals; 551.51
• DOI: 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2016.10.055
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1352-2310

Abstract

Abstract: The contributions of various PM2.5 emission sources to ambient PM2.5 levels during 2013 in the main hub port city (Busan, South Korea) of East Asia was quantified using several receptor modeling techniques. Three receptor models of principal component analysis/absolute principal component score (PCA/APCS), positive matrix factorization (PMF), and chemical mass balance (CMB) were used to apportion the source of PM2.5 obtained from the target city. The results of the receptor models indicated that the secondary formation of PM2.5 was the dominant (45–60%) contributor to PM2.5 levels in the port city of Busan. The PMF and PCA/APCS suggested that ship emission was a non-negligible contributor of PM2.5 (up to about 10%) in the study area, whereas it was a negligible contributor based on CMB. The magnitude of source contribution estimates to PM2.5 levels differed significantly among these three models due to their limitations (e.g., PM2.5 emission source profiles and restrictions of the models). Potential source contribution function and concentration-weighted trajectory analyses indicated that long-range transport from sources in the eastern China and Yellow Sea contributed significantly to the level of PM2.5 in Busan. Highlights: The magnitude of source contribution estimates to PM2.5 levels differed significantly among three receptor models. Analysis of PM2.5 source apportionment by PMF is likely to be more reliable than that by CMB. The secondary aerosol was a dominant contributor to PM2.5 levels. The PMF and PCA/APCS suggested that ship emission was a non-negligible contributor of PM2.5 .