What processes contribute to the spring and fall bloom co-variability on the Eastern Bering Sea shelf?. (December 2016)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Cheng, Wei; Curchitser, Enrique; Stock, Charles; Hermann, Albert; Cokelet, Edward; Mordy, Calvin; Stabeno, Phyllis; Hervieux, Gaelle; Castruccio, Frederic
• Is Part Of: Deep sea research. Volume 134(2016)
• Page Start: 128
• Page End: 140
• Publication Date: 2016-12
• Subjects: Sea ice -- Phytoplankton bloom -- Primary production -- Nutrient -- Numerical model; Oceanography -- Periodicals; Ocean bottom -- Periodicals; Marine biology -- Periodicals; 551.46
• DOI: 10.1016/j.dsr2.2015.07.009
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0967-0645

Abstract

Abstract: Observations indicate that spring and fall phytoplankton blooms on the Eastern Bering Sea (EBS) continental shelf tend to co-vary on inter-annual scales – that is, a year with a strong spring bloom also tends to have a strong fall bloom. Similar co-variability of primary production is also seen in the multi-year (1987–2007) integration of a coupled physical–biological model. Moreover, the modeled seasonal amplitudes of 10-meter chlorophyll-a concentrations at the EBS middle shelf mooring locations, computed using the canonical Redfield ratio and a mean carbon-to-chlorophyll-a ratio, are generally consistent with the in situ mooring measurements. The coupled physical–biological model simulation is used to examine the relative contributions of wind mixing, local nutrient recycling/regeneration, horizontal nutrient advection, and water-column stability to this co-variability. There is no significant correlation between the spring and fall surface wind mixing. Although wind mixing is an important mechanism for bringing nutrients in the lower water column to the surface layers, it is not the mechanism tying the two seasons׳ productivity together. Local regeneration/recycling of the nutrients initially fueling spring production is an important mechanism for spring-to-fall nutrient accumulation in the bottom layers at the middle shelf. Horizontal advection does not appear to be the dominant factor for supplying nutrients to the middle shelf during the spring-to-fall period. Fall primary production in the model is strongly influenced by the lower water-column stability/stratification. Taken together, these results highlight the importance of local recycling/regeneration of nutrients assimilated by spring phytoplankton bloom in linking together the spring and fall primary productions on EBS middle shelf.