Age–period–cohort analyses of obesity prevalence in US adults. (December 2016)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Age–period–cohort analyses of obesity prevalence in US adults. (December 2016)
- Main Title:
- Age–period–cohort analyses of obesity prevalence in US adults
- Authors:
- An, R.
Xiang, X. - Abstract:
- Abstract: Objectives: Age–period–cohort analysis is a stream of methodologies that decompose the temporal trends for disease risk into three time scales—age, calendar year (period) and year of birth (cohort). This study conducted age–period–cohort analyses of obesity prevalence in US adults. Study design: Retrospective data analysis. Methods: We constructed regression models based on anthropometric data from the 1999–2012 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey to correct for the self-reported height/weight in the 1984–2014 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS). We estimated fixed-effects age–period–cohort models based on the BRFSS data for the overall adult sample ( n = 6, 093, 293) and by sex and race/ethnicity, adjusting for individual characteristics and the BRFSS survey design. Results: An inverted U-shaped age effect on obesity and a positive period effect characterized by over-time increase in obesity risk independent of age and cohort influences were identified in the overall sample and subgroups by sex and race/ethnicity. From 1984 to 2014, the adjusted obesity prevalence increased by 21.1 percentage points among US adults, and 20.9, 21.6, 21.0, 26.4 and 20.1 percentage points in men, women, non-Hispanic whites, African Americans and Hispanics, respectively. In contrast, no consistent evidence was found in support of the cohort effect—the adjusted obesity risk was comparable across birth cohorts after accounting for the age and period effects.Abstract: Objectives: Age–period–cohort analysis is a stream of methodologies that decompose the temporal trends for disease risk into three time scales—age, calendar year (period) and year of birth (cohort). This study conducted age–period–cohort analyses of obesity prevalence in US adults. Study design: Retrospective data analysis. Methods: We constructed regression models based on anthropometric data from the 1999–2012 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey to correct for the self-reported height/weight in the 1984–2014 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS). We estimated fixed-effects age–period–cohort models based on the BRFSS data for the overall adult sample ( n = 6, 093, 293) and by sex and race/ethnicity, adjusting for individual characteristics and the BRFSS survey design. Results: An inverted U-shaped age effect on obesity and a positive period effect characterized by over-time increase in obesity risk independent of age and cohort influences were identified in the overall sample and subgroups by sex and race/ethnicity. From 1984 to 2014, the adjusted obesity prevalence increased by 21.1 percentage points among US adults, and 20.9, 21.6, 21.0, 26.4 and 20.1 percentage points in men, women, non-Hispanic whites, African Americans and Hispanics, respectively. In contrast, no consistent evidence was found in support of the cohort effect—the adjusted obesity risk was comparable across birth cohorts after accounting for the age and period effects. Conclusions: Shifts in the age distribution and nationwide secular changes may have fuelled the obesity epidemic in the USA over the past decades. Reversing the obesity epidemic may require understanding of the nationwide changes over time that affect weight gain across all population subgroups and promoting universal changes to diet, physical activity and the obesogenic environment. Highlights: We conducted age–period–cohort analyses of obesity prevalence in US adults. We identified an inverted U-shaped age effect on obesity. We found a positive period effect characterized by over-time rise in obesity risk. In contrast, no consistent evidence was found in support of the cohort effect. Obesity risk was stable across birth cohorts controlling for age and period effects. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Public health. Volume 141(2016)
- Journal:
- Public health
- Issue:
- Volume 141(2016)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 141, Issue 2016 (2016)
- Year:
- 2016
- Volume:
- 141
- Issue:
- 2016
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2016-0141-2016-0000
- Page Start:
- 163
- Page End:
- 169
- Publication Date:
- 2016-12
- Subjects:
- Age–period–cohort analysis -- Obesity -- BRFSS -- NHANES
Public health -- Periodicals
Public health -- Periodicals
Electronic journals
362.1 - Journal URLs:
- http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/00333506 ↗
http://intl.elsevierhealth.com/journals/pubh/ ↗
http://www.clinicalkey.com/dura/browse/journalIssue/00333506 ↗
http://www.clinicalkey.com.au/dura/browse/journalIssue/00333506 ↗
http://www.elsevier.com/journals ↗
http://www.journals.elsevier.com/public-health ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1016/j.puhe.2016.09.021 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 0033-3506
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 6963.850000
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 95.xml