An analysis of pose in 3D stereophotogrammetry of the breast. Issue 12 (December 2016)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- An analysis of pose in 3D stereophotogrammetry of the breast. Issue 12 (December 2016)
- Main Title:
- An analysis of pose in 3D stereophotogrammetry of the breast
- Authors:
- Hameeteman, Marijn
Verhulst, Arico C.
Maal, Thomas J.J.
Ulrich, Dietmar J.O. - Abstract:
- Summary: Background: Volume of the breast can be objectively measured by three-dimensional (3D) photographs. This study describes the analysis of three different positions of the patient in image acquisition, in order to find the best pose for reproducible 3D photographs of the breasts. Method: Twenty-four patients were included between February and September 2014 in a consecutive way. Data were collected prospectively. 3D photographs were acquired using a stereophotogrammetry system. Images were taken twice in three different positions (arms behind the back, arms placed on the hips and arms horizontally placed). Surface based matching was applied and the absolute mean distance between the surfaces of both 3D models of the same position was calculated. This difference measure represents the similarity of the photographs. Results: Univariate ANOVA showed a significant difference in distance between the three positions (sum of squares 1.12, p < 0.001). The horizontal position presented the lowest absolute mean distance (0.45 mm). Additional post hoc multiple comparisons analysis revealed a statistically significant difference between the distances of horizontal and back position (−0.22 mm, p < 0.001) and of back and hip position (0.13 mm, p = 0.009), with better results of the horizontal and hip positions, respectively. Conclusion: Standardization of 3D acquisition in pre- and postoperative breast imaging could improve imaging reproducibility. Based on the results of thisSummary: Background: Volume of the breast can be objectively measured by three-dimensional (3D) photographs. This study describes the analysis of three different positions of the patient in image acquisition, in order to find the best pose for reproducible 3D photographs of the breasts. Method: Twenty-four patients were included between February and September 2014 in a consecutive way. Data were collected prospectively. 3D photographs were acquired using a stereophotogrammetry system. Images were taken twice in three different positions (arms behind the back, arms placed on the hips and arms horizontally placed). Surface based matching was applied and the absolute mean distance between the surfaces of both 3D models of the same position was calculated. This difference measure represents the similarity of the photographs. Results: Univariate ANOVA showed a significant difference in distance between the three positions (sum of squares 1.12, p < 0.001). The horizontal position presented the lowest absolute mean distance (0.45 mm). Additional post hoc multiple comparisons analysis revealed a statistically significant difference between the distances of horizontal and back position (−0.22 mm, p < 0.001) and of back and hip position (0.13 mm, p = 0.009), with better results of the horizontal and hip positions, respectively. Conclusion: Standardization of 3D acquisition in pre- and postoperative breast imaging could improve imaging reproducibility. Based on the results of this study, we recommend a pose with the arms in a horizontal position. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Journal of plastic, reconstructive & aesthetic surgery. Volume 69:Issue 12(2016:Dec.)
- Journal:
- Journal of plastic, reconstructive & aesthetic surgery
- Issue:
- Volume 69:Issue 12(2016:Dec.)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 69, Issue 12 (2016)
- Year:
- 2016
- Volume:
- 69
- Issue:
- 12
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2016-0069-0012-0000
- Page Start:
- 1609
- Page End:
- 1613
- Publication Date:
- 2016-12
- Subjects:
- Three-dimensional imaging -- 3D stereophotogrammetry -- Breast surgery -- Diagnostic accuracy
Surgery, Plastic -- Great Britain -- Periodicals
Reconstructive Surgical Procedures -- Periodicals
Surgery, Plastic -- Great Britain -- Periodicals
617.9505 - Journal URLs:
- http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/17486815 ↗
http://www.elsevier.com/journals ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1016/j.bjps.2016.08.010 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 1748-6815
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 5040.695800
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 895.xml