Barriers to goals of care discussions with hospitalized patients with advanced heart failure: feasibility and performance of a novel questionnaire. (28th June 2016)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Aleksova, Natasha; Demers, Catherine; Strachan, Patricia H.; MacIver, Jane; Downar, James; Fowler, Robert; Heyland, Daren K.; Ross, Heather J.; You, John J.
• Is Part Of: ESC heart failure. Volume 3:Number 4(2016)
• Page Start: 245
• Page End: 252
• Publication Date: 2016-06-28
• Subjects: Heart failure -- Communication -- Goals of care -- Decision‐making -- End‐of‐life care; Heart failure -- Periodicals; 616.129005
• DOI: 10.1002/ehf2.12096
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 2055-5822

Abstract

Abstract: Aims: Good end‐of‐life communication and decision‐making are important to patients with advanced heart failure (HF) and their families, but their needs remain unmet. In this pilot study, we describe the feasibility and performance of a novel questionnaire aimed at identifying barriers and solutions to improve communication and decision‐making about goals of care for hospitalized patients with advanced HF. Methods: We distributed questionnaires to staff cardiologists, cardiology trainees, and cardiology nurses who provide care for HF patients at a Canadian teaching hospital. The questionnaire asked about the importance of various barriers to goals of care discussions. It also asked participants to rank their willingness to engage in goals of care discussions and their views on other clinicians could engage in such discussions. Results: Of 76 clinicians, 44 (58%) completed the questionnaire (median completion time, 17 min). Individual survey questions had few missing responses (0% to 2%) for questions about barriers to goals of care discussions. There was appreciable discrimination of the importance of different barriers (mean scores 2.2 to 6.0 on a 7‐point scale). Preliminary data suggest that clinicians perceive patient and family factors, such as difficulty accepting a poor prognosis, as the most important barriers preventing goals of care discussions. Conclusions: In this pilot study, we have demonstrated the feasibility of a novel questionnaire to be used in a larger multi‐centre study of end‐of‐life HF care. Essential information will be obtained to inform the design and evaluation of interventions that seek to improve communication and decision‐making about goals of care with HF patients.