Testing and validation of multi‐lidar scanning strategies for wind energy applications. Issue 12 (16th March 2016)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Newman, Jennifer F.; Bonin, Timothy A.; Klein, Petra M.; Wharton, Sonia; Newsom, Rob K.
• Is Part Of: Wind energy. Volume 19:Issue 12(2016)
• Page Start: 2239
• Page End: 2254
• Publication Date: 2016-03-16
• Subjects: Doppler lidar -- turbulence -- virtual tower -- scanning lidar; Wind power -- Periodicals; 621.312136
• DOI: 10.1002/we.1978
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1095-4244

Abstract

Abstract: Several factors cause lidars to measure different values of turbulence than an anemometer on a tower, including volume averaging, instrument noise and the use of a scanning circle to estimate the wind field. One way to avoid the use of a scanning circle is to deploy multiple scanning lidars and point them toward the same volume in space to collect velocity measurements and extract high‐resolution turbulence information. This paper explores the use of two multi‐lidar scanning strategies, the tri‐Doppler technique and the virtual tower technique, for measuring 3‐D turbulence. In summer 2013, a vertically profiling Leosphere WindCube lidar and three Halo Photonics Streamline lidars were operated at the Southern Great Plains Atmospheric Radiation Measurement site to test these multi‐lidar scanning strategies. During the first half of the field campaign, all three scanning lidars were pointed at approximately the same point in space and a tri‐Doppler analysis was completed to calculate the three‐dimensional wind vector every second. Next, all three scanning lidars were used to build a 'virtual tower' above the WindCube lidar. Results indicate that the tri‐Doppler technique measures higher values of horizontal turbulence than the WindCube lidar under stable atmospheric conditions, reduces variance contamination under unstable conditions and can measure high‐resolution profiles of mean wind speed and direction. The virtual tower technique provides adequate turbulence information under stable conditions but cannot capture the full temporal variability of turbulence experienced under unstable conditions because of the time needed to readjust the scans. Copyright © 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.