A new approach to profiling taphonomic history through bone fracture analysis, with an example application to the Linearbandkeramik site of Ludwinowo 7. (October 2016)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Johnson, Emily V.; Parmenter, Pip C.R.; Outram, Alan K.
• Is Part Of: Journal of archaeological science. Volume 9(2016)
• Page Start: 623
• Page End: 629
• Publication Date: 2016-10
• Subjects: Taphonomy -- Zooarchaeology -- Bone fracture -- Carcass processing -- Deposition -- LBK -- Neolithic; Archaeology -- Periodicals; Archaeology -- Research -- Periodicals; 930.1
• DOI: 10.1016/j.jasrep.2016.08.047
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 2352-409X

Abstract

Abstract: This paper presents a new method of assessing and displaying taphonomic history through detailed bone fracture analysis. Bone is a particularly useful indicator of taphonomic processes as it is sensitive to when it is broken based on degradation over time. Our proposed 'fracture history profiles' show the sequences of fracture and fragmentation that have affected assemblages of bone specimens from the death of the animal to recovery by archaeologists. The method provides an assessment of the carcass processing traditions of past people, relating specifically to bone marrow and bone grease extraction. In addition, by analysing post-deposition fracture and bone modifications caused by burning, gnawing and other taphonomic agents, it is possible to reconstruct a comprehensive taphonomic history for each archaeological context. This has implications for understanding effects on other artefacts that have no equivalent diagnostic features for determining timing of breakage, and also for establishing the nature of events such as secondary disturbance of deposits. This method will be demonstrated using a case study from the Neolithic Linearbandkeramik culture. Highlights: We present a new method of displaying taphonomic history using bone fracture analysis, called a 'fracture history profile'. These profiles show processing, site formation and post-depositional sequences affecting animal bone specimens. The method allows understanding of taphonomic histories of non-bone artefacts lacking comparable diagnostic features. The case study uses these profiles to show differences in consumption and deposition between archaeological contexts.