Dynamic comparison on the usage of probiotics in organic wastewater treatment under aerobic conditions in a diurnal environment. (1st December 2016)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Dynamic comparison on the usage of probiotics in organic wastewater treatment under aerobic conditions in a diurnal environment. (1st December 2016)
- Main Title:
- Dynamic comparison on the usage of probiotics in organic wastewater treatment under aerobic conditions in a diurnal environment
- Authors:
- Liu, Jun
Liu, Yali
Li, Guoqin
Shen, Junda
Tao, Zhengrong
Tian, Yong
Chen, Li
Li, Chunmei
Lu, Lizhi - Abstract:
- ABSTRACT: This study aims at evaluating and comparing pollution removal in wastewater treatment via the use of probiotics alone or in combination under aerobic conditions in diurnal cycles. Herein, 650 mL of organic wastewater was stored in 1-L conical flasks and then randomly divided into three treatment groups, each experiment was repeated three times. Group A was supplemented with 2% ( v / v ) photosynthetic bacteria (PSB; Rhodopseudomonas palustris ) alone; group B was supplemented with 2% ( v / v ) B. subtilis alone; and group C was supplemented with 1% ( v / v ) PSB and 1% ( v / v ) B. subtilis . Results showed that the pH increases were in the order: group A < group C < group B. The performance of the probiotics in terms of ammonia nitrogen and total nitrogen (TN) removal was in the order: group A < group C < group B, whereas in terms of total organic matter (TOC) and total carbon (TC) removal, the order was group C < group B < group A. These results showed that the effect of probiotics combination treatment on ammonia nitrogen and TN removal was better than that of using B. subtilis alone, but worse than that of using PSB alone. The effect of B. subtilis alone treatment on TOC and TC removal was better than that of using PSB alone, but the combination of PSB and B. subtilis showed greater benefits on TOC and TC removal. Implications : Photosynthetic bacteria and B. subtilis were used in this study to investigate carbon and nitrogen metabolism via the use of differentABSTRACT: This study aims at evaluating and comparing pollution removal in wastewater treatment via the use of probiotics alone or in combination under aerobic conditions in diurnal cycles. Herein, 650 mL of organic wastewater was stored in 1-L conical flasks and then randomly divided into three treatment groups, each experiment was repeated three times. Group A was supplemented with 2% ( v / v ) photosynthetic bacteria (PSB; Rhodopseudomonas palustris ) alone; group B was supplemented with 2% ( v / v ) B. subtilis alone; and group C was supplemented with 1% ( v / v ) PSB and 1% ( v / v ) B. subtilis . Results showed that the pH increases were in the order: group A < group C < group B. The performance of the probiotics in terms of ammonia nitrogen and total nitrogen (TN) removal was in the order: group A < group C < group B, whereas in terms of total organic matter (TOC) and total carbon (TC) removal, the order was group C < group B < group A. These results showed that the effect of probiotics combination treatment on ammonia nitrogen and TN removal was better than that of using B. subtilis alone, but worse than that of using PSB alone. The effect of B. subtilis alone treatment on TOC and TC removal was better than that of using PSB alone, but the combination of PSB and B. subtilis showed greater benefits on TOC and TC removal. Implications : Photosynthetic bacteria and B. subtilis were used in this study to investigate carbon and nitrogen metabolism via the use of different probiotics and then study further on comparing and achieving the best pollution removal performance in probiotics alone or in combination treatment. To make observations realistic, the experiments were conducted under aerobic conditions in a diurnal cycle environment. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association. Volume 66:Number 12(2016)
- Journal:
- Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association
- Issue:
- Volume 66:Number 12(2016)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 66, Issue 12 (2016)
- Year:
- 2016
- Volume:
- 66
- Issue:
- 12
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2016-0066-0012-0000
- Page Start:
- 1183
- Page End:
- 1190
- Publication Date:
- 2016-12-01
- Subjects:
- Air -- Pollution -- Periodicals
Air quality management -- Periodicals
Hazardous wastes -- Management -- Periodicals
Air Pollution -- prevention & control -- Periodicals
Hazardous Waste -- prevention & control -- Periodicals
Waste Management -- Periodicals
628.5305 - Journal URLs:
- http://secure.awma.org/journal/Archives.aspx ↗
http://vnweb.hwwilsonweb.com/hww/Journals/searchAction.jhtml?sid=HWW:ASTFT&issn=1096-2247 ↗
http://www.tandfonline.com/loi/uawm20 ↗
http://www.tandfonline.com/ ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1080/10962247.2016.1158131 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 1047-3289
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 4682.450000
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 2084.xml