Liquid fiducial marker performance during radiotherapy of locally advanced non small cell lung cancer. Issue 1 (October 2016)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Rydhög, Jonas Scherman; Mortensen, Steen Riisgaard; Larsen, Klaus Richter; Clementsen, Paul; Jølck, Rasmus Irming; Josipovic, Mirjana; Aznar, Marianne Camille; Specht, Lena; Andresen, Thomas Lars; Rosenschöld, Per Munck af; Persson, Gitte Fredberg
• Is Part Of: Radiotherapy and oncology. Volume 121:Issue 1(2016:Oct.)
• Page Start: 64
• Page End: 69
• Publication Date: 2016-10
• Subjects: Image-guided radiotherapy -- Marker visibility -- Liquid fiducial marker -- NSCLC; Oncology -- Periodicals; Radiotherapy -- Periodicals; Tumors -- Periodicals; Medical Oncology -- Periodicals; Neoplasms -- radiotherapy -- Periodicals; Radiotherapy -- Periodicals; Radiothérapie -- Périodiques; Cancérologie -- Périodiques; Tumeurs -- Périodiques; Electronic journals; 616.9940642
• DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2016.06.012
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0167-8140

Abstract

Abstract: Background and purpose: We analysed the positional and structural stability of a long-term biodegradable liquid fiducial marker (BioXmark) for radiotherapy in patients with locally advanced lung cancer. Material and methods: Markers were injected via endoscopic- or endobronchial ultrasound in lymph nodes and reachable primary tumours. Marker volume and Hounsfield Units (HU) changing rates were estimated using breath-hold CBCT. Inter-fraction variation in marker position relative to gross tumour volume (GTV) position was established, as well as the inter-fraction variation in mediastinal marker registration relative to a carina registration through the treatment. Results: Fifteen patients were included and 29 markers analysed. All markers that were in situ at planning were visible through the treatment. Mean HU was 902 ± 165 HU for lymph node and 991 ± 219 HU for tumour markers. Volume degradation rates were −5% in lymph nodes and −23% in primary tumours. Three-dimensional inter-fraction variation for marker position relative to the GTV position was −0.1 ± 0.7 mm in lymph nodes and −1.5 ± 2.3 mm in primary tumours. Inter-fraction variations in marker registration relative to carina registration were −0.4 ± 1.2 mm in left–right, 0.2 ± 2.0 mm in anterior–posterior and −0.5 ± 2.0 mm in cranio-caudal directions. Conclusions: The liquid fiducial markers were visible and stable in size and position throughout the treatment course.