Anthropic fractures and human tooth marks: An experimental approach to non-technological human action on avian long bones. (9th November 2016)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Romero, Antonio J.; Díez, J. Carlos; Rodríguez, Laura; Arceredillo, Diego
• Is Part Of: Quaternary international. Volume 421(2016)
• Page Start: 219
• Page End: 227
• Publication Date: 2016-11-09
• Subjects: Experimental archaeology -- Taphonomy -- Avian long bones -- Human breakage -- Human tooth marks -- Fractures; Geology, Stratigraphic -- Quaternary -- Periodicals; Stratigraphie -- Quaternaire -- Périodiques; 551.79
• DOI: 10.1016/j.quaint.2015.10.005
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1040-6182

Abstract

Abstract: Anthropic fracture of avian bones has received scarce experimental attention. Prehistoric bird consumption is assumed from references in studies of lagomorphs or small mammals, despite the fact that avian bones are quite different from those of mammals and rodents. Their consumption by humans can be addressed experimentally. This paper presents the results of a study in which fresh chicken ( Gallus ) thighs were fractured using hands and teeth, with no technological assistance. Results showed that fractures are different from those of larger animals, resulting in the proposal of a new classification of fragments. The location of the fracture influences its line and angle and, above all, the ensuing splintering. The fracture types and characteristics of notches, tooth marks, scores and depressions have led the authors to propose a model of fragmentation and marks that can be applied to avian remains at archaeological sites.