Effects of the length of central cancer registry operations on identification of subsequent cancers and on survival estimates. (October 2016)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Qiao, Baozhen; Schymura, Maria J.; Kahn, Amy R.
• Is Part Of: Cancer epidemiology. Volume 44(2016:Oct.)
• Page Start: 52
• Page End: 58
• Publication Date: 2016-10
• Subjects: Cancer survival -- Subsequent primary cancers -- Multiple primary cancers -- Length of registry operations; Cancer -- Epidemiology -- Periodicals; Cancer -- Prevention -- Periodicals; Cancer -- Diagnosis -- Periodicals; Carcinogenesis -- Periodicals; 616.994005
• DOI: 10.1016/j.canep.2016.07.010
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1877-7821

Abstract

Highlights: A significant proportion of newly diagnosed cancer cases were registered as subsequent primary cancers. The length of registry operations had an effect on its ability to correctly classify subsequent cancers. When only the first primary cancer was selected, survival estimates were affected by the registry operation length, although this effect was relatively small. Survival estimates based on all primary cancers were slightly lower, but might be more comparable across registries. Abstract: Background: Population-based cancer survival analyses have traditionally been based on the first primary cancer. Recent studies have brought this practice into question, arguing that varying registry reference dates affect the ability to identify earlier cancers, resulting in selection bias. We used a theoretical approach to evaluate the extent to which the length of registry operations affects the classification of first versus subsequent cancers and consequently survival estimates. Methods: Sequence number central was used to classify tumors from the New York State Cancer Registry, diagnosed 2001–2010, as either first primaries (value = 0 or 1) or subsequent primaries (≥2). A set of three sequence numbers, each based on an assumed reference year (1976, 1986 or 1996), was assigned to each tumor. Percent of subsequent cancers was evaluated by reference year, cancer site and age. 5-year relative survival estimates were compared under four different selection scenarios. Results: The percent of cancer cases classified as subsequent primaries was 15.3%, 14.3% and 11.2% for reference years 1976, 1986 and 1996, respectively; and varied by cancer site and age. When only the first primary was included, shorter registry operation time was associated with slightly lower 5-year survival estimates. When all primary cancers were included, survival estimates decreased, with the largest decreases seen for the earliest reference year. Conclusions: Registry operation length affected the identification of subsequent cancers, but the overall effect of this misclassification on survival estimates was small. Survival estimates based on all primary cancers were slightly lower, but might be more comparable across registries.