Detection of suspected small bowel bleeding: challenges and controversies. (1st November 2016)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Pasha, Shabana F.; Leighton, Jonathan A.
• Is Part Of: Expert review of gastroenterology & hepatology. Volume 10:Number 11(2016)
• Page Start: 1235
• Page End: 1244
• Publication Date: 2016-11-01
• Subjects: Small bowel bleeding -- obscure gastrointestinal bleeding -- capsule endoscopy -- deep enteroscopy -- double balloon enteroscopy -- single balloon enteroscopy -- multiphase CT scan -- CT angiogram -- CT enterography -- mesenteric angiography -- intraoperative enteroscopy; Gastroenterology -- Periodicals; Liver -- Diseases -- Periodicals; 616.3
• DOI: 10.1080/17474124.2016.1207525
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1747-4124

Abstract

ABSTRACT: Introduction : Detection of small bowel (SB) bleeding remains a challenge to gastroenterologists, with a dearth of standardized recommendations regarding evaluation and management. Areas covered : A recursive literature search was performed using PubMed, Cochrane and Medline databases for original and review articles on SB and obscure gastrointestinal bleeding (OGIB). Based upon the available literature, this review outlines the main challenges and controversies, and provides a practical and cost-effective approach towards SB bleeding. Expert commentary : SB bleeding is suspected in patients with persistent or recurrent bleeding after negative bidirectional endoscopy, and unexplained iron deficiency anemia. Selection of test(s) should be individualized based upon patient presentation and suspicion for type of underlying lesion. Endoscopic or radiologic evaluation and treatment is the mainstay in the majority of patients, while pharmacologic agents may have a role in patients with refractory bleeding, and those unable to undergo evaluation.