Radiologically inserted gastrostomy: differences of maintenance of balloon- vs. loop-retained devices. (1st December 2016)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Radiologically inserted gastrostomy: differences of maintenance of balloon- vs. loop-retained devices. (1st December 2016)
- Main Title:
- Radiologically inserted gastrostomy: differences of maintenance of balloon- vs. loop-retained devices
- Authors:
- Busch, J.D.
Herrmann, J.
Adam, G.
Habermann, C.R. - Abstract:
- Abstract: Purpose: To compare outcome and associated complications of ballon- vs. loop-retained devices for radiologically inserted gastrostomy (RIG). Methods: From 2007 to 2011 233 patients (age 63.7 ± 10.6 years) were referred for a RIG because of pharyngeal stricture Intervention was performed with four different devices: balloon-retained – Freka ® GastroTube, Fresenius Kabi ( n = 121); MIC ® Gastrostomy Feeding Tube, Kimberly–Clark ( n = 34); Russell ® Gastrostomy Tray, Cook Medical Inc. ( n = 17); and loop-retained – Tilma ® Gastrostomy Set, Cook Medical Inc. ( n = 50). Follow-up was performed with regard to RIG -related complications, cause of removal and fatalities. Revision-free survival times after RIG were evaluated using Kaplan–Meier analysis and group differences by log-rank tests. For analysis of demographic and methodical variables multivariate Cox regression models were used. Results: With a primary technical success rate of 95.3% (222/233) a total of 92 instances of revisions were necessary in 66 patients (66/233, 28.3%) during follow-up (mean 182.8 ± 86.6 days). The most common complication was tube dislodgement (14.3%). There were no significant differences between the distinct devices ( p = 0.098), but analyzing the data in subgroups of balloon-compared to loop-retained gastrostomy tubes we observed a significantly higher probability of minor complications for the latter ( p = 0.023). Conclusion: As it is significantly less prone to minorAbstract: Purpose: To compare outcome and associated complications of ballon- vs. loop-retained devices for radiologically inserted gastrostomy (RIG). Methods: From 2007 to 2011 233 patients (age 63.7 ± 10.6 years) were referred for a RIG because of pharyngeal stricture Intervention was performed with four different devices: balloon-retained – Freka ® GastroTube, Fresenius Kabi ( n = 121); MIC ® Gastrostomy Feeding Tube, Kimberly–Clark ( n = 34); Russell ® Gastrostomy Tray, Cook Medical Inc. ( n = 17); and loop-retained – Tilma ® Gastrostomy Set, Cook Medical Inc. ( n = 50). Follow-up was performed with regard to RIG -related complications, cause of removal and fatalities. Revision-free survival times after RIG were evaluated using Kaplan–Meier analysis and group differences by log-rank tests. For analysis of demographic and methodical variables multivariate Cox regression models were used. Results: With a primary technical success rate of 95.3% (222/233) a total of 92 instances of revisions were necessary in 66 patients (66/233, 28.3%) during follow-up (mean 182.8 ± 86.6 days). The most common complication was tube dislodgement (14.3%). There were no significant differences between the distinct devices ( p = 0.098), but analyzing the data in subgroups of balloon-compared to loop-retained gastrostomy tubes we observed a significantly higher probability of minor complications for the latter ( p = 0.023). Conclusion: As it is significantly less prone to minor complications we recommend the use of balloon-retained gastrostomy tubes to improve the practicability and maintenance of RIG. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Scandinavian journal of gastroenterology. Volume 51:Number 12(2016)
- Journal:
- Scandinavian journal of gastroenterology
- Issue:
- Volume 51:Number 12(2016)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 51, Issue 12 (2016)
- Year:
- 2016
- Volume:
- 51
- Issue:
- 12
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2016-0051-0012-0000
- Page Start:
- 1423
- Page End:
- 1428
- Publication Date:
- 2016-12-01
- Subjects:
- Nutrition -- percutaneous gastrostomy -- pharyngeal stricture
Gastroenterology -- Periodicals
Digestive organs -- Diseases -- Periodicals
616.33 - Journal URLs:
- http://informahealthcare.com/loi/gas ↗
http://informahealthcare.com ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1080/00365521.2016.1216590 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 0036-5521
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 8087.507000
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library STI - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 2743.xml