Planning a Stigmatized Nonvisible Illness Disclosure: Applying the Disclosure Decision-Making Model. Issue 8 (16th November 2016)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Choi, Soe Yoon; Venetis, Maria K.; Greene, Kathryn; Magsamen-Conrad, Kate; Checton, Maria G.; Banerjee, Smita C.
• Is Part Of: Journal of psychology. Volume 150:Issue 8(2016)
• Page Start: 1004
• Page End: 1025
• Publication Date: 2016-11-16
• Subjects: Efficacy -- nonvisible illness -- self-disclosure planning -- stigma; Psychology -- Periodicals; Psychology -- Periodicals; Psychologie; 150
• DOI: 10.1080/00223980.2016.1226742
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0022-3980

Abstract

ABSTRACT: This study applied the disclosure decision-making model (DD-MM) to explore how individuals plan to disclose nonvisible illness (Study 1), compared to planning to disclose personal information (Study 2). Study 1 showed that perceived stigma from the illness negatively predicted disclosure efficacy; closeness predicted anticipated response (i.e., provision of support) although it did not influence disclosure efficacy; disclosure efficacy led to reduced planning, with planning leading to scheduling. Study 2 demonstrated that when information was considered to be intimate, it negatively influenced disclosure efficacy. Unlike the model with stigma (Study 1), closeness positively predicted both anticipated response and disclosure efficacy. The rest of the hypothesized relationships showed a similar pattern to Study 1: disclosure efficacy reduced planning, which then positively influenced scheduling. Implications of understanding stages of planning for stigmatized information are discussed.