Evaluation of physiological strain in hot work areas using thermal imagery. (October 2016)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Holm, Clint A.; Pahler, Leon; Thiese, Matthew S.; Handy, Rodney
• Is Part Of: Journal of thermal biology. Volume 61(2016)
• Page Start: 8
• Page End: 15
• Publication Date: 2016-10
• Subjects: Heat strain -- Heat stress -- Core temperature -- Physiological strain index -- Hot work -- Thermal imaging; Thermobiology -- Periodicals; Temperature -- Periodicals; Biology -- Periodicals; Thermobiologie -- Périodiques; Thermobiology; Periodicals; 571.46
• DOI: 10.1016/j.jtherbio.2016.07.013
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0306-4565

Abstract

Abstract: Background: Monitoring core body temperature to identify heat strain in workers engaged in hot work in heat stress environments is intrusive and expensive. Nonintrusive, inexpensive methods are needed to calculate individual Physiological Strain Index (PSI). Objective: Thermal imaging and heart rate monitoring were used in this study to calculate Physiological Strain Index (PSI) from thermal imaging temperatures of human subjects wearing thermal protective garments during recovery from hot work. Methods: Ten male subjects were evaluated for physiological strain while participating in hot work. Thermal images of the head and neck were captured with a high-resolution thermal imaging camera concomitant with measures of gastrointestinal and skin temperature. Lin's concordance correlation coefficient (rho_c), Pearson's coefficient (r) and bias correction factor (C-b) were calculated to compare thermal imaging based temperatures to gastrointestinal temperatures. Calculations of PSI based thermal imaging recorded temperatures were compared to gastrointestinal based PSI. Results: Participants reached a peak PSI of 5.2, indicating moderate heat strain. Sagittal measurements showed low correlation (rho_c=0.133), moderate precision (r=0.496) and low accuracy (C_b=0.269) with gastrointestinal temperature. Bland-Altman plots of imaging measurements showed increasing agreement as gastrointestinal temperature rose; however, the Limits of Agreement (LoA) fell outside the ±0.25 C range of clinical significance. Bland-Altman plots of PSI calculated from imaging measurements showed increasing agreement as gastrointestinal temperature rose; however, the LoA fell outside the ±0.5 range of clinical significance. Conclusion: Results of this study confirmed previous research showing thermal imagery is not highly correlated to body core temperature during recovery from moderate heat strain in mild ambient conditions. Measurements display a trend toward increasing correlation at higher body core temperatures. Accuracy was not sufficient at mild to moderate heat strain to allow calculation of individual physiological stress. Highlights: Thermal imaging and body core temperatures increase in agreement as core temperature rises. Gastrointestinal temperature is affected by ingestion of cool liquid up to 16 h post temperature pill ingestion. Thermal imaging may be useful as a screening tool for detection of thermal strain.