Does AMBER Alert 'save lives'? An empirical analysis and critical implications. Issue 4 (1st October 2016)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Griffin, Timothy; Williams, Joshua H.; Wooldredge, John; Miller, Danielle
• Is Part Of: Journal of crime and justice. Volume 39:Issue 4(2016)
• Page Start: 490
• Page End: 511
• Publication Date: 2016-10-01
• Subjects: America's Missing: Broadcast Emergency Response Alert -- child abduction -- familial abduction; Crime -- Periodicals; Criminal justice, Administration of -- Periodicals; Criminal psychology -- Periodicals; Crime -- United States -- Periodicals; Criminal justice, Administration of -- United States -- Periodicals; Police -- United States -- Periodicals; 364.05
• DOI: 10.1080/0735648X.2014.1003577
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0735-648X

Abstract

Abstract : A sample of 448 child abduction cases in which America's Missing: Broadcast Emergency Response (AMBER) Alert was issued was examined to determine the extent to which AMBER Alert is successful in rescuing abducted children, and whether the successes suggest 'lifesaving' rescues. We reached conclusions consistent with the scant available prior research on AMBER Alert: although over 25% of the Alerts facilitated the recovery of abducted child(ren) and are thus arguably 'successful' by that standard alone, there was little evidence AMBER Alerts 'save lives.' In fact, AMBER Alert success cases are in almost every measurable way identical to AMBER Alert cases in which the child(ren) were returned unharmed but the Alert had no direct role in that outcome: they typically involve abduction by family members and other (apparently) non-life-threatening abductors, and the vast majority of recovery times are over 3 h. The implications for the public discourse regarding AMBER Alert and directions for future research are discussed.