Sulfur dioxide emission reduction of power plants in China: current policies and implications. (1st February 2016)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Sulfur dioxide emission reduction of power plants in China: current policies and implications. (1st February 2016)
- Main Title:
- Sulfur dioxide emission reduction of power plants in China: current policies and implications
- Authors:
- Liu, Xiying
Lin, Boqiang
Zhang, Yanjiang - Abstract:
- Abstract: Electricity generation by conventional fossil fuel power plants have caused severe environmental problems worldwide. Besides greenhouse gas emissions which has global impacts on the climate, there are also pollutant emissions like sulfur dioxide which endanger the local environment. In particular, for developing countries who often highly rely on coal for power generation due to their resource endowment and the competitive costs of coal, the issue of environment pollution caused by coal-fired power plants is getting increasingly severe. Therefore, various solutions should be combined and implemented to address the issue, including environmental regulation, and economic and financial incentives. This study conducted an industry survey in 7 coal-fired power plants in China to collect detailed data in the field to examine the costs and benefits of flue gas desulfurization. Currently, coal-fired power plants in China which install and properly operate flue gas desulfurization equipment can receive 15 Yuan/MWh premium tariff on top of their on-grid tariffs. However, this study shows that this incentive is insufficient to cover the flue gas desulfurization costs of most of the sample plants. More solutions, both regulatory and market-based, should be considered to address this issue. Firstly, under China's current regulated power plants dispatch scheme, allocating generation hour based on the pollutant emission would provide strong incentive for sulfur dioxideAbstract: Electricity generation by conventional fossil fuel power plants have caused severe environmental problems worldwide. Besides greenhouse gas emissions which has global impacts on the climate, there are also pollutant emissions like sulfur dioxide which endanger the local environment. In particular, for developing countries who often highly rely on coal for power generation due to their resource endowment and the competitive costs of coal, the issue of environment pollution caused by coal-fired power plants is getting increasingly severe. Therefore, various solutions should be combined and implemented to address the issue, including environmental regulation, and economic and financial incentives. This study conducted an industry survey in 7 coal-fired power plants in China to collect detailed data in the field to examine the costs and benefits of flue gas desulfurization. Currently, coal-fired power plants in China which install and properly operate flue gas desulfurization equipment can receive 15 Yuan/MWh premium tariff on top of their on-grid tariffs. However, this study shows that this incentive is insufficient to cover the flue gas desulfurization costs of most of the sample plants. More solutions, both regulatory and market-based, should be considered to address this issue. Firstly, under China's current regulated power plants dispatch scheme, allocating generation hour based on the pollutant emission would provide strong incentive for sulfur dioxide mitigation. Secondly, it is suggested to provide more supportive financial environment for flue gas desulfurization industry by fiscal supports, diverse financing accesses, and innovation financial and business models. Thirdly, more environmental regulation tools such as emission cap and emission discharge fees should be set properly and examined carefully, to optimize their impacts on economy, society and environment. Finally, the analysis and results of this study can also be applied in other fields such as denitration and dedusting of coal-fired power plants. Highlights: Coal-fired power generation industry faces challenges in flue gas desulfurization. On-grid tariff premium can hardly cover their desulfurization costs. Annual operation hour and gross investment are major sensitivity factors. Regulatory, economic and financial methods are needed to promote desulfurization. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Journal of cleaner production. Volume 113(2016:Feb.)
- Journal:
- Journal of cleaner production
- Issue:
- Volume 113(2016:Feb.)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 113 (2016)
- Year:
- 2016
- Volume:
- 113
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2016-0113-0000-0000
- Page Start:
- 133
- Page End:
- 143
- Publication Date:
- 2016-02-01
- Subjects:
- Flue gas desulfurization -- On-grid tariff premium policy -- Cost–benefit analysis
Factory and trade waste -- Management -- Periodicals
Manufactures -- Environmental aspects -- Periodicals
Déchets industriels -- Gestion -- Périodiques
Usines -- Aspect de l'environnement -- Périodiques
628.5 - Journal URLs:
- http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/09596526 ↗
http://www.elsevier.com/journals ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.12.046 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 0959-6526
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 4958.369720
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 647.xml