Small-scale land acquisitions, large-scale implications: Exploring the case of Chinese banana investments in Northern Laos. (30th November 2016)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Friis, Cecilie; Nielsen, Jonas Østergaard
• Is Part Of: Land use policy. Volume 57(2016:Nov.)
• Page Start: 117
• Page End: 129
• Publication Date: 2016-11-30
• Subjects: Land grabbing -- Control grabbing -- Powers of exclusion -- Banana plantations -- Scale -- Land use change; Land use -- Periodicals; Land use -- Government policy -- Periodicals; Sol, Utilisation du -- Périodiques; Sol, Utilisation du -- Politique gouvernementale -- Périodiques; Electronic journals; 333.7305
• DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2016.05.028
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0264-8377

Abstract

Highlights: A case study of the actors, scales and processes involved in 'small-scale' and 'short-term' land acquisitions for banana cultivation in Northern Laos. The banana investors establish networks of local middlemen to acquire land at the village level without involving the government. Rapid land use conversion, the destruction of plot borders and chemical pollution create a lock-in of land use. The land acquisitions result in a de facto 'control grab' and strong alienation of the land. Policies aimed at addressing the adverse implications of 'land grabbing' need to take 'small-scale land acquisitions' into account. Abstract: The scholarly debate around 'global land grabbing' is advancing theoretically, methodologically and empirically. This study contributes to these ongoing efforts by investigating a set of 'small-scale land acquisitions' in the context of a recent boom in banana plantation investments in Luang Namtha Province, Laos. In relation to the actors, scales and processes involved, the banana acquisitions differ from the state-granted large-scale land acquisitions dominating the literature on 'land grabbing' in Laos. Starting from the experience of a rural village in Laos, where two Chinese banana investors leased land on six-year contracts in 2010, we trace the strategies employed by the investors to gain access to the land, the experience of the villagers in the process and the outcome of the acquisitions in terms of land use change. The findings reveal how the investors established networks of local middlemen who facilitate negotiations over land directly at the village level, thus enabling them to circumvent any formal involvement of government authorities. The informal acquisition process also ensured a rapid and successful implementation of the plantations with consequent land use change, including the destruction of field structures, plot borders and irrigation systems, as well as erosion and heavy chemical input. Drawing upon the literature on 'powers of exclusion' and 'control grabbing', the paper argues that despite the apparent small-scale and short-term nature of these leases, the forceful acquisition strategies pursued by the investors coupled with the rapid land use conversion and associated cultivation practices results in strong and longer-term alienation of land from the local communities involved. This implies the need to take these more informal forms of land acquisitions into account when designing policies to address the negative implications of land grabbing in Laos and elsewhere.