Quantifying the effect of side branches in endothelial shear stress estimates. (August 2016)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Giannopoulos, Andreas A.; Chatzizisis, Yiannis S.; Maurovich-Horvat, Pal; Antoniadis, Antonios P.; Hoffmann, Udo; Steigner, Michael L.; Rybicki, Frank J.; Mitsouras, Dimitrios
• Is Part Of: Atherosclerosis. Volume 251(2016)
• Page Start: 213
• Page End: 218
• Publication Date: 2016-08
• Subjects: Endothelial shear stress -- Coronary computed tomography -- Computational fluid dynamics -- Side branches; Arteriosclerosis -- Periodicals; Electronic journals; 616.136
• DOI: 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2016.06.038
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0021-9150

Abstract

Abstract: Background and aims: Low and high endothelial shear stress (ESS) is associated with coronary atherosclerosis progression and high-risk plaque features. Coronary ESS is currently assessed via computational fluid dynamic (CFD) simulation of coronary blood flow in the lumen geometry determined from invasive imaging such as intravascular ultrasound and optical coherence tomography. This process typically omits side branches of the target vessel in the CFD model as invasive imaging of those vessels is not usually clinically-indicated. The purpose of this study was to determine the extent to which this simplification affects the determination of those regions of the coronary endothelium subjected to pathologic ESS. Methods: We determined the diagnostic accuracy of ESS profiling without side branches to detect pathologic ESS in the major coronary arteries of 5 hearts imaged ex vivo with computed tomography angiography (CTA). ESS of the three major coronary arteries was calculated both without (test model), and with (reference model) inclusion of all side branches >1.5 mm in diameter, using previously-validated CFD approaches. Diagnostic test characteristics (accuracy, sensitivity, specificity and negative and positive predictive value [NPV/PPV]) with respect to the reference model were assessed for both the entire length as well as only the proximal portion of each major coronary artery, where the majority of high-risk plaques occur. Results: Using the model without side branches overall accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, NPV and PPV were 83.4%, 54.0%, 96%, 95.9% and 55.1%, respectively to detect low ESS, and 87.0%, 67.7%, 90.7%, 93.7% and 57.5%, respectively to detect high ESS. When considering only the proximal arteries, test characteristics differed for low and high ESS, with low sensitivity (67.7%) and high specificity (90.7%) to detect low ESS, and low sensitivity (44.7%) and high specificity (95.5%) to detect high ESS. Conclusions: The exclusion of side branches in ESS vascular profiling studies greatly reduces the ability to detect regions of the major coronary arteries subjected to pathologic ESS. Single-conduit models can in general only be used to rule out pathologic ESS. Highlights: Coronary CTA enables evaluation of ESS with or without including side branches. ESS calculated omitting side branches has good negative predictive value for pathologic ESS. In the proximal coronary arteries, single conduit models can still only be used to rule out pathologic ESS.