Component greenhouse gas fluxes and radiative balance from two deltaic marshes in Louisiana: Pairing chamber techniques and eddy covariance. Issue 6 (14th June 2016)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Krauss, Ken W.; Holm, Guerry O.; Perez, Brian C.; McWhorter, David E.; Cormier, Nicole; Moss, Rebecca F.; Johnson, Darren J.; Neubauer, Scott C.; Raynie, Richard C.
• Is Part Of: Journal of geophysical research. Volume 121:Issue 6(2016:Jun.)
• Page Start: 1503
• Page End: 1521
• Publication Date: 2016-06-14
• Subjects: carbon fluxes -- wetlands -- soil fluxes -- net ecosystem exchange; Geobiology -- Periodicals; Biogeochemistry -- Periodicals; Biotic communities -- Periodicals; Geophysics -- Periodicals; 577.14
• DOI: 10.1002/2015JG003224
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 2169-8953

Abstract

Abstract: Coastal marshes take up atmospheric CO2 while emitting CO2, CH4, and N2 O. This ability to sequester carbon (C) is much greater for wetlands on a per area basis than from most ecosystems, facilitating scientific, political, and economic interest in their value as greenhouse gas sinks. However, the greenhouse gas balance of Gulf of Mexico wetlands is particularly understudied. We describe the net ecosystem exchange (NEEc ) of CO2 and CH4 using eddy covariance (EC) in comparison with fluxes of CO2, CH4, and N2 O using chambers from brackish and freshwater marshes in Louisiana, USA. From EC, we found that 182 g C m −2 yr −1 was lost through NEEc from the brackish marsh. Of this, 11 g C m −2 yr −1 resulted from net CH4 emissions and the remaining 171 g C m −2 yr −1 resulted from net CO2 emissions. In contrast, −290 g C m 2 yr −1 was taken up through NEEc by the freshwater marsh, with 47 g C m −2 yr −1 emitted as CH4 and −337 g C m −2 yr −1 taken up as CO2 . From chambers, we discovered that neither site had large fluxes of N2 O. Sustained‐flux greenhouse gas accounting metrics indicated that both marshes had a positive (warming) radiative balance, with the brackish marsh having a substantially greater warming effect than the freshwater marsh. That net respiratory emissions of CO2 and CH4 as estimated through chamber techniques were 2–4 times different from emissions estimated through EC requires additional understanding of the artifacts created by different spatial and temporal sampling footprints between techniques. Key Points: A brackish marsh was a source and a freshwater marsh was a sink for net ecosystem fluxes of C CH4 and CO2 emission estimates were different using eddy covariance versus static flux chambers Radiative balance of marshes varied by accounting technique applied