Preference for multitasking, technological dependency, student metacognition, & pervasive technology use: An experimental intervention. (December 2016)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Terry, Colin A.; Mishra, Punya; Roseth, Cary J.
• Is Part Of: Computers in human behavior. Volume 65(2016)
• Page Start: 241
• Page End: 251
• Publication Date: 2016-12
• Subjects: Multitasking -- Attention -- Metacognition -- Anxiety -- Attitude -- Technology; Interactive computer systems -- Periodicals; Man-machine systems -- Periodicals; 004.019
• DOI: 10.1016/j.chb.2016.08.009
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0747-5632

Abstract

Abstract: Technology-enabled multitasking has garnered increased critical attention in recent years. Research on multitasking in educational environments commonly assert a multitude of undesired outcomes such as heightened distraction, hindered learning, and hampered productivity. This study considers critical research gaps related to media multitasking, including student metacognitive awareness. In addition, this study tested a commonly suggested, yet previously untested, educational response wherein students are made aware of the problematic phenomenon, with the aim of mitigating the pervasive behavior. Findings suggest that student technology use is highly attributed to their anxiety without technology and dependency on technology, rather than any actual preference for multitasking. Metacognitive awareness was inconclusively correlated with rampant technology use; however, those who exhibited higher behavioral management tendencies demonstrated greater control of their technology use. And while the quasi-experimental awareness intervention failed to shift student media multitasking behavior, promising areas for future research were illuminated through the qualitative analysis. Highlights: Self-report technology usage and multitasking measure that considers student metacognitive awareness. Quasi-experimental intervention testing commonly asserted awareness-based pedagogical response. Preference for multitasking not an informative motivator for exhibited multitasking behavior. Insightful qualitative analysis of student perceptions related to distraction, technology, and attention.