Controllability and flexibility analysis of CO2 post-combustion capture using piperazine and MEA. (August 2016)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Gaspar, Jozsef; Ricardez-Sandoval, Luis; Jørgensen, John Bagterp; Fosbøl, Philip Loldrup
• Is Part Of: International journal of greenhouse gas control. Volume 51(2016:Aug.)
• Page Start: 276
• Page End: 289
• Publication Date: 2016-08
• Subjects: Controllability -- Flexible operation -- Dynamic CO2 capture rate-based model -- Piperazine -- Sensitivity study; Greenhouse gases -- Environmental aspects -- Periodicals; Air -- Purification -- Technological innovations -- Periodicals; Gaz à effet de serre -- Périodiques; Gaz à effet de serre -- Réduction -- Périodiques; Air -- Purification -- Technological innovations; Greenhouse gases -- Environmental aspects; Periodicals; 363.73874605
• DOI: 10.1016/j.ijggc.2016.06.003
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1750-5836

Abstract

Highlights: A decentralized control structure for CO2 capture using PZ and MEA was proposed. The dynamic response of the capture plant was investigated. The proposed control scheme for PZ and MEA was compared. Shortage in steam supply (reboiler duty) as an operational bottleneck was identified. Abstract: In this study, we developed a decentralized control scheme and investigate the performance of the piperazine (PZ) and monoethanolamine (MEA) CO2 capture process for industrially-relevant operation scenarios. The base for the design of the control schemes is Relative Gain Array (RGA) analysis combined with open-loop dynamic sensitivity analysis. This study suggests that controllers with smaller time integrals and larger gains are required to maintain the PZ plant within reasonable short closed-loop settling times when compared to MEA. It also shows that the offset from the designated set-points in the presence of disturbances in the flue gas flow and heat duty is larger using PZ compared to MEA. The settling time for the PZ plant is generally larger than for MEA. However, the PZ plant rejects the disturbances faster and with less variability in the load of the power plant. Furthermore, this study indicates that the proposed PI-based control structure can handle large changes in the load provided that the manipulated variables, i.e. lean solvent flow or reboiler duty, do not reach their saturation limit. Additionally, we observed that shortage in the steam supply (reboiler duty) may represent a critical operational bottleneck, especially when PZ is being used. The MEA plant controllers drive the system towards drying out/flooding while the CO2 capture rate performance of the PZ plant reduces drastically in the presence of constraints in the availability of steam. These findings suggest the need for advanced control structures, e.g. MPC, which can explicitly account for constraints in the process variables.