Expert judgement. (15th April 2016)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Ashcroft, M.; Austin, R.; Barnes, K.; MacDonald, D.; Makin, S.; Morgan, S.; Taylor, R.; Scolley, P.
• Is Part Of: British actuarial journal. Volume 21:Number 2(2016)
• Page Start: 314
• Page End: 363
• Publication Date: 2016-04-15
• Subjects: Expert Judgement, -- Solvency II, -- Materiality, -- Process, -- Validation; Actuarial science -- Periodicals; Insurance, Life -- Periodicals; Periodicals; Periodicals; 368.010941
• DOI: 10.1017/S1357321715000239
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1357-3217

Abstract

Abstract: Expert judgement has been used since the actuarial profession was founded. In the past, there has often been a lack of transparency regarding the use of expert judgement, even though those judgements could have a very significant impact on the outputs of calculations and the decisions made by organisations. The lack of transparency has a number of dimensions, including the nature of the underlying judgements, as well as the process used to derive those judgements. This paper aims to provide a practical framework regarding expert judgement processes, and how those processes may be validated. It includes a worked example illustrating how the process could be used for setting a particular assumption. It concludes with some suggested tools for use within expert judgement. Although primarily focussed on the insurance sector, the proposed process framework could be applied more widely without the need for significant changes.