Vision and initial feasibility analysis of a recarbonised Finnish energy system for 2050. (December 2016)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Child, Michael; Breyer, Christian
• Is Part Of: Renewable & sustainable energy reviews. Volume 66(2017)
• Page Start: 517
• Page End: 536
• Publication Date: 2016-12
• Subjects: RE renewable energy -- PV photovoltaic -- GHG greenhouse gas -- LPG liquid petroleum gas -- CHP combined heat and power -- DH district heating -- BAU business as usual -- e electric units -- th thermal units -- gas gas units -- p nominal or peak capacity -- TPED total primary energy demand -- PtG Power-to-gas -- PtL Power-to-liquid -- PtX Power-to-chemical -- V2G Vehicle-to-grid -- BEV Battery electric vehicle -- Capex Capital expenditures -- Opex Operating and maintenance expenditures -- LCOE Levelized cost of electricity -- WACC Weighted average cost of capital -- Crf Capital recovery factor -- GDP Gross Domestic Product; Energy system analysis -- Renewable energy -- Finland -- Energy storage -- Power-to-Gas; Renewable energy sources -- Periodicals; Power resources -- Periodicals; Énergies renouvelables -- Périodiques; Ressources énergétiques -- Périodiques; 333.794
• DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2016.07.001
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1364-0321

Abstract

Abstract: An energy system based entirely on renewable energy (RE) is possible for Finland in 2050 based on the assumptions in this study. High shares of solar PV (photovoltaics) were deemed to be feasible at extreme northern latitudes when supported by flexibility harnessed from other aspects of the energy system, suggesting that high variations in solar irradiation throughout the year may not be a barrier to the implementation of solar PV closer to the poles. A 100% RE system corresponds to a highly competitive cost solution for Finland, as total system costs decrease through interaction between the power, heating/cooling and mobility sectors. We incorporate these sectors on an hourly resolution using historical data and the EnergyPLAN modelling tool. In addition, we offer full transparency of all assumptions regarding the Finnish energy system. In 2050, a 100% renewable energy scenario has the lowest overall annual cost, at 24.1 b€/a. This is followed by several scenarios that feature increasing levels of nuclear power, which range in annual costs to 26.4 b€/a. Scenarios were also modelled with varying levels of forest-based biomass. Results suggest that annual costs do not increase dramatically with reduced levels of forest-based biomass fuel use. At the same time, it must be kept in mind that assigning costs to the future is inherently uncertain. How future societies assign risk to technologies or place value on emissions can make the scenarios under investigation more or less attractive. The 100% RE scenarios under investigation were seen as less exposed to such uncertainty. Highlights: Future energy systems were modelled for Finland with high shares of renewable energy. High installed capacities of solar PV are feasible at extreme northern latitudes. Unlocking potential flexibility in the system creates opportunities for lower cost solutions. 100% renewable scenarios are cost competitive with those that feature nuclear power. A highly independent Finnish energy system can also achieve carbon reduction targets.