Comparing welfare estimates across stated preference and uncertainty elicitation formats for air quality improvements in Nairobi, Kenya. (17th February 2016)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Ndambiri, Hilary; Brouwer, Roy; Mungatana, Eric
• Is Part Of: Environment and development economics. Volume 21:Number 5(2016:Oct.)
• Page Start: 649
• Page End: 668
• Publication Date: 2016-02-17
• Subjects: Economic development -- Environmental aspects; 330.9
• DOI: 10.1017/S1355770X15000455
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1355-770X

Abstract

Abstract: The effect of preference uncertainty on estimated willingness to pay (WTP) is examined using identical payment cards and alternative uncertainty elicitation procedures in three split samples, focusing on air quality improvement in Nairobi. The effect of the stochastic payment card (SPC) and polychotomous payment card (PPC) are compared with a conventional payment card (PC). Substantial financial support is found for improved air quality in Nairobi, with approximately 85 per cent of the whole sample stating a positive WTP. The way WTP values are elicited, with and without ability to express preference uncertainty, has significant effect on WTP welfare estimate. Allowing respondents to express experienced uncertainty when stating WTP value yields more conservative but less accurate WTP values for inclusion in policy analysis. The PPC seems to hold more promise since it is easier to understand and imposes less cognitive burden on survey participants than the SPC in a developing country context.