Drug Coated Balloon Is Less Effective for Treatment of DES In‐Stent Restenosis Both in Native Coronary Arteries and Saphenous Vein Grafts: Results From a Bicenter Registry. (1st August 2016)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Resch, Markus; Ostheim, Patrick; Endemann, Dierk H.; Debl, Kurt; Buchner, Stefan; Birner, Christoph; Maier, Lars S.; Kerber, Sebastian; Luchner, Andreas; Griese, Daniel P.
• Is Part Of: Journal of interventional cardiology. Volume 29:Number 5(2016:Oct.)
• Page Start: 461
• Page End: 468
• Publication Date: 2016-08-01
• Subjects: Cardiology -- Periodicals; Heart -- Diseases -- Periodicals; 616.1206
• DOI: 10.1111/joic.12324
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0896-4327

Abstract

Abstract : Background: The paclitaxel drug coated balloon (DCB) is an established treatment for bare metal stent (BMS) in‐stent restenosis (ISR) in native coronary arteries. The evidence of DCB‐application for drug eluting stent (DES) ISR both in native coronaries and saphenous vein grafts (SVG) is limited. Aim of our study was to compare the differential efficacy of DCB for treatment of BMS‐ and DES‐ISR in native coronary vessels and SVGs. Methods and Results: N = 135 DCB‐treated patients with available follow up (FU) angiography were included in this retrospective study. Patients received treatment between April 2009 and March 2013 at 2 tertiary care hospitals in Germany. DCB was applied in BMS‐ISR (n = 65; 48%) and DES‐ISR (n = 70; 52%). DCB‐treated lesions were located in native coronary arteries (n = 110; 81%; BMS‐ISR: n = 58; 53%; DES‐ISR: n = 52; 47%) and SVGs (n = 25; 19%; BMS‐ISR: n = 7, 28%; DES‐ISR: n = 18, 72%). Median FU was 12 months. Endpoints were binary restenosis and target lesion revascularization (TLR). Binary restenosis (29% vs. 57%; P < 0.01) and TLR (18% vs. 46%; P < 0.01) were significantly more frequent in DES‐ISR versus BMS‐ISR. In SVGs, TLR was required in 72% (DES‐ISR) versus 14% (BMS‐ISR); P = 0.02. In the Kaplan–Meier‐analysis freedom from both endpoints was significantly decreased in the DES‐lesions both in the total population (binary restenosis P < 0.01; TLR P < 0.01) and native coronaries (binary restenosis P = 0.02; TLR P = 0.04). Conclusions: DCB treatment is less effective in DES‐ISR than in BMS‐ISR. The diminished efficacy of DCB treatment is even more pronounced in DES‐ISR located within degenerated SVGs.