A systematic review of the relationship factor between women and health professionals within the multivariant analysis of maternal satisfaction. (October 2016)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Macpherson, Ignacio; Roqué-Sánchez, María V.; Legget, BN, Finola O.; Fuertes, Ferran; Segarra, Ignacio
• Is Part Of: Midwifery. Volume 41(2016)
• Page Start: 68
• Page End: 78
• Publication Date: 2016-10
• Subjects: Satisfaction -- Maternity care -- Multivariate analysis -- Childbirth -- Relationship; Midwifery -- Periodicals; Midwifery -- Periodicals; Sages-femmes -- Périodiques; Midwifery; Periodicals; Electronic journals; 618.2005
• DOI: 10.1016/j.midw.2016.08.003
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0266-6138

Abstract

Abstract: Introduction: personalised support provided to women by health professionals is one of the prime factors attaining women's satisfaction during pregnancy and childbirth. However the multifactorial nature of 'satisfaction' makes difficult to assess it. Statistical multivariate analysis may be an effective technique to obtain in depth quantitative evidence of the importance of this factor and its interaction with the other factors involved. This technique allows us to estimate the importance of overall satisfaction in its context and suggest actions for healthcare services. Methods: systematic review of studies that quantitatively measure the personal relationship between women and healthcare professionals (gynecologists, obstetricians, nurse, midwifes, etc.) regarding maternity care satisfaction. The literature search focused on studies carried out between 1970 and 2014 that used multivariate analyses and included the woman-caregiver relationship as a factor of their analysis. Results: twenty-four studies which applied various multivariate analysis tools to different periods of maternity care (antenatal, perinatal, post partum) were selected. The studies included discrete scale scores and questionnaires from women with low-risk pregnancies. The "personal relationship" factor appeared under various names: care received, personalised treatment, professional support, amongst others. The most common multivariate techniques used to assess the percentage of variance explained and the odds ratio of each factor were principal component analysis and logistic regression. Discussion: the data, variables and factor analysis suggest that continuous, personalised care provided by the usual midwife and delivered within a family or a specialised setting, generates the highest level of satisfaction. In addition, these factors foster the woman's psychological and physiological recovery, often surpassing clinical action (e.g. medicalization and hospital organization) and/or physiological determinants (e.g. pain, pathologies, etc.). Highlights: Care, consideration and support are identified more relevant than clinical outcomes. Sensitivity, fulfilment and support perception configure childbirth satisfaction. The personalised and continuous care by the habitual midwife maximizes satisfaction. A familiar or an specialized setting further enhance maternal satisfaction.