Evaluation of an automated fetal myocardial performance index. (13th September 2016)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Welsh, A. W.; Maheshwari, P.; Wang, J.; Henry, A.; Chang, D.; Crispi, F.; Gardiner, H. M.; Hernandez‐Andrade, E.; Meriki, N.; Redmond, S.; Yagel, S.
• Is Part Of: Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology. Volume 48:Number 4(2016)
• Page Start: 496
• Page End: 503
• Publication Date: 2016-09-13
• Subjects: automation -- cardiac MPI -- Doppler -- fetus; Ultrasonics in obstetrics -- Periodicals; Generative organs, Female -- Diseases -- Diagnosis -- Periodicals; Diagnosis, Ultrasonic -- Periodicals; Genital Diseases, Female -- ultrasonography -- Periodicals; Ultrasonography, Prenatal -- Periodicals; 618.047543
• DOI: 10.1002/uog.15770
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0960-7692

Abstract

Abstract: Objective: To compare automated measurements of the fetal left myocardial performance index (MPI) with manual measurements for absolute value, repeatability and waveform acceptability. Methods: This was a multicenter international online study using images from uncomplicated, morphologically normal singleton pregnancies (16–38 weeks' gestation). Single Doppler ultrasound cardiac cycle images of 25 cases were selected, triplicated and randomized ( n = 75). Six senior observers, unaware of the repetition of images, manually calculated MPI for each waveform and the results were compared with automation. Intraobserver repeatability and interobserver reproducibility were assessed using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) and 95% CI. The agreement between each observer's manual MPI measurements and corresponding automated measurements was evaluated using Bland–Altman plots and ICCs with 95% CI. The degree of variation between experts in the classification of fetal MPI waveform quality was assessed using individual cardiac cycle left MPI images previously classified by two authors as 'optimal', 'suboptimal' or 'unacceptable', with 30 images selected for each quality group. Ten images in each category were duplicated and the resulting 120 images were randomized and then classified online by five observers. The kappa statistic (κ) was used to demonstrate interobserver and intraobserver agreement and agreement of classifications by the five observers. Results: The automated measurement software returned the same value for any given image, resulting in an ICC of 1.00. Manual measurements had intraobserver repeatability ICC values ranging from 0.69 to 0.97, and the interobserver reproducibility ICC was 0.78. Comparison of automated vs manual MPI absolute measurements for each observer gave ICCs ranging from 0.77 to 0.96. Interobserver image quality classification agreement gave k = 0.69 ( P < 0.001), and the intraobserver agreement was variable (κ ranging from 0.40 to 0.81). Conclusions: Automated fetal MPI provides superior repeatability and reproducibility to manual methodology. Additionally, experts vary significantly when classifying suitability of fetal MPI waveforms. Automated MPI may facilitate clinical translation by removing human subjectivity. Copyright © 2015 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.