Risk factors for dating violence versus cohabiting violence: Results from the third generation of the Cambridge Study in Delinquent Development. (October 2016)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Risk factors for dating violence versus cohabiting violence: Results from the third generation of the Cambridge Study in Delinquent Development. (October 2016)
- Main Title:
- Risk factors for dating violence versus cohabiting violence: Results from the third generation of the Cambridge Study in Delinquent Development
- Authors:
- Theobald, Delphine
Farrington, David P.
Ttofi, Maria M.
Crago, Rebecca V. - Other Names:
- Farrington David guestEditor.
Theobald Delphine guestEditor. - Abstract:
- Abstract: Background: Dating violence is an important problem. Evidence suggests that women are more likely to perpetrate dating violence. Aims: The present study investigates the prevalence of dating violence compared with cohabiting violence in a community sample of men and women and assesses to what extent child and adolescent explanatory factors predict this behaviour. A secondary aim is to construct a risk score for dating violence based on the strongest risk factors. Methods: The Cambridge Study in Delinquent Development is a prospective longitudinal survey of 411 men (generation 2) born in the 1950s in an inner London area. Most recently, their sons and daughters [generation 3 (G3)] have been interviewed regarding their perpetration of dating and cohabiting violence, utilising the Conflict Tactics Scale. Risk factors were measured in four domains (family, parental, socio‐economic and individual). Results: A larger proportion of women than men perpetrated at least one act of violence towards their dating partner (36.4 vs 21.7%). There was a similar pattern for cohabiting violence (39.6 vs 21.4%). A number of risk factors were significantly associated with the perpetration of dating violence. For G3 women, these included a convicted father, parental conflict, large family size and poor housing. For G3 men, these included having a young father or mother, separation from the father before age 16, early school leaving, frequent truancy and having a criminal conviction. AAbstract: Background: Dating violence is an important problem. Evidence suggests that women are more likely to perpetrate dating violence. Aims: The present study investigates the prevalence of dating violence compared with cohabiting violence in a community sample of men and women and assesses to what extent child and adolescent explanatory factors predict this behaviour. A secondary aim is to construct a risk score for dating violence based on the strongest risk factors. Methods: The Cambridge Study in Delinquent Development is a prospective longitudinal survey of 411 men (generation 2) born in the 1950s in an inner London area. Most recently, their sons and daughters [generation 3 (G3)] have been interviewed regarding their perpetration of dating and cohabiting violence, utilising the Conflict Tactics Scale. Risk factors were measured in four domains (family, parental, socio‐economic and individual). Results: A larger proportion of women than men perpetrated at least one act of violence towards their dating partner (36.4 vs 21.7%). There was a similar pattern for cohabiting violence (39.6 vs 21.4%). A number of risk factors were significantly associated with the perpetration of dating violence. For G3 women, these included a convicted father, parental conflict, large family size and poor housing. For G3 men, these included having a young father or mother, separation from the father before age 16, early school leaving, frequent truancy and having a criminal conviction. A risk score for both men and women, based on 10 risk factors, significantly predicted dating violence. Conclusion: Risk factors from four domains were important in predicting dating violence, but they were different for G3 men and women. It may be important to consider different risk factors and different risk assessments for male compared with female perpetration of dating violence. Early identification and interventions are recommended. Copyright © 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Criminal behaviour and mental health. Volume 26:Number 4(2016)
- Journal:
- Criminal behaviour and mental health
- Issue:
- Volume 26:Number 4(2016)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 26, Issue 4 (2016)
- Year:
- 2016
- Volume:
- 26
- Issue:
- 4
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2016-0026-0004-0000
- Page Start:
- 229
- Page End:
- 239
- Publication Date:
- 2016-10
- Subjects:
- Forensic psychiatry -- Periodicals
Criminal behavior -- Periodicals
Criminal psychology -- Periodicals
Criminal Psychology -- Periodicals
Dangerous Behavior -- Periodicals
Mental Disorders -- Periodicals
Comportement criminel
Criminel
Psychologie
Santé mentale
Psychiatrie médico-légale
Psychologie criminelle
Périodique électronique (Descripteur de forme)
Ressource Internet (Descripteur de forme)
364.305 - Journal URLs:
- http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1002/(ISSN)1471-2857 ↗
http://www.ingenta.com/journals/browse/whurr/cbm ↗
http://www3.interscience.wiley.com/journal/112094296/home ↗
http://www.whurr.co.uk/CBMH/IntroCentre%5FFr.html ↗
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/ ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1002/cbm.2017 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 0957-9664
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 3487.346200
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 535.xml