Frontal plane comparison between drop jump and vertical jump: implications for the assessment of ACL risk of injury. Issue 4 (1st October 2016)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Cesar, Guilherme M.; Tomasevicz, Curtis L.; Burnfield, Judith M.
• Is Part Of: Sports biomechanics. Volume 15:Issue 4(2016)
• Page Start: 440
• Page End: 449
• Publication Date: 2016-10-01
• Subjects: Risk of ACL injury -- kinematics -- kinetics -- female athletes -- lower extremity assessment; Biomechanics -- Periodicals; Sports -- Physiological aspects -- Periodicals; Human mechanics -- Periodicals; 617.1027
• DOI: 10.1080/14763141.2016.1174286
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1476-3141

Abstract

Abstract: The potential to use the vertical jump (VJ) to assess both athletic performance and risk of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury could have widespread clinical implications since VJ is broadly used in high school, university, and professional sport settings. Although drop jump (DJ) and VJ observationally exhibit similar lower extremity mechanics, the extent to which VJ can also be used as screening tool for ACL injury risk has not been assessed. This study evaluated whether individuals exhibit similar knee joint frontal plane kinematic and kinetic patterns when performing VJs compared with DJs. Twenty-eight female collegiate athletes performed DJs and VJs. Paired t -tests indicated that peak knee valgus angles did not differ significantly between tasks ( p = 0.419); however, peak knee internal adductor moments were significantly larger during the DJ vs. VJ ( p < 0.001). Pearson correlations between the DJ and VJ revealed strong correlations for knee valgus angles ( r = 0.93, p < 0.001) and for internal knee adductor moments ( r = 0.82, p < 0.001). Our results provide grounds for investigating whether frontal plane knee mechanics during VJ can predict ACL injuries and thus can be used as an effective tool for the assessment of risk of ACL injury in female athletes.