Effect of baseline obesity and postoperative weight gain on the risk of channel revision following continent catheterizable urinary channel surgery. Issue 4 (August 2016)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Effect of baseline obesity and postoperative weight gain on the risk of channel revision following continent catheterizable urinary channel surgery. Issue 4 (August 2016)
- Main Title:
- Effect of baseline obesity and postoperative weight gain on the risk of channel revision following continent catheterizable urinary channel surgery
- Authors:
- Chan, Katherine H.
Szymanski, Konrad M.
Li, Xiaochun
Ofner, Susan
Flack, Chandra
Judge, Benjamin
Whittam, Benjamin
Misseri, Rosalia
Kaefer, Martin
Rink, Richard C.
Cain, Mark P. - Abstract:
- Summary: Objective: Prior studies suggest that obese patients are at increased risk for complications following continent catheterizable urinary (CCU) channel surgery. We hypothesized that postoperative weight gain increases the risk of channel angulation, difficulty catheterizing, and possible channel perforation requiring subfascial revision. The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether baseline obesity or becoming overweight/obese postoperatively was associated with a greater risk of subfascial revision. Method: We reviewed retrospectively an institutional database of patients who underwent CCU channel surgery between the ages of ≥2 and <20 years from January 1990 to May 2013, excluding those with continent urinary reservoirs, continent vesicostomies, and those without body mass index (BMI) data. We collected data on patient/procedure characteristics, baseline/most recent BMI, and subfascial revision(s). We used Cox proportional hazard multivariable regression to assess the association of being overweight/obese at baseline (≥85% BMI) with time to first subfascial revision, and Fisher's exact test to compare rates of subfascial revision between those who became overweight/obese and those who did not. Results: Of the patients, 328/501 (65.5%) had baseline and post-baseline BMI data available: 53.4% male, 90.6% white, median age 7.4 years; median follow-up 76.4 months. Of the 328 patients, 38 (11.6%) had subfascial revisions. Baseline BMI data were available for 378Summary: Objective: Prior studies suggest that obese patients are at increased risk for complications following continent catheterizable urinary (CCU) channel surgery. We hypothesized that postoperative weight gain increases the risk of channel angulation, difficulty catheterizing, and possible channel perforation requiring subfascial revision. The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether baseline obesity or becoming overweight/obese postoperatively was associated with a greater risk of subfascial revision. Method: We reviewed retrospectively an institutional database of patients who underwent CCU channel surgery between the ages of ≥2 and <20 years from January 1990 to May 2013, excluding those with continent urinary reservoirs, continent vesicostomies, and those without body mass index (BMI) data. We collected data on patient/procedure characteristics, baseline/most recent BMI, and subfascial revision(s). We used Cox proportional hazard multivariable regression to assess the association of being overweight/obese at baseline (≥85% BMI) with time to first subfascial revision, and Fisher's exact test to compare rates of subfascial revision between those who became overweight/obese and those who did not. Results: Of the patients, 328/501 (65.5%) had baseline and post-baseline BMI data available: 53.4% male, 90.6% white, median age 7.4 years; median follow-up 76.4 months. Of the 328 patients, 38 (11.6%) had subfascial revisions. Baseline BMI data were available for 378 patients, and, of these, 130 (34.4%) were overweight/obese at baseline. Overweight/obese patients were more likely to undergo umbilical Monti (10% vs. 8.1%), non-umbilical spiral Monti (33.8% vs. 13.7%), and spiral umbilical Monti channels (13.8% vs. 7.3%) versus normal/underweight patients ( p < 0.0001). From a multivariable Cox proportional hazard model controlling for age, BMI category, diagnosis, and ambulatory status, the hazard of subfascial revision for spiral umbilical Monti channels was 2.1× that of other channels (hazard ratio (HR) 2.1 [95% CI 1.2–3.8], p = 0.01). Fifty-one out of 328 patients (15.6%) became overweight/obese postoperatively, with 7.8% having a subfascial revision vs. 12.3% of those whose weight category decreased or remained stable ( p = 0.3) (Table 1). Conclusions: Patients who were overweight/obese at baseline were more likely to have channels constructed that are at the highest risk of subfascial revision. Patients who became overweight/obese postoperatively were not at greater risk of subfascial revision. Limitations include potential bias because of differential follow-up and inaccuracy of BMI percentile as a measurement of obesity. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Journal of pediatric urology. Volume 12:Issue 4(2016)
- Journal:
- Journal of pediatric urology
- Issue:
- Volume 12:Issue 4(2016)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 12, Issue 4 (2016)
- Year:
- 2016
- Volume:
- 12
- Issue:
- 4
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2016-0012-0004-0000
- Page Start:
- 249.e1
- Page End:
- 249.e7
- Publication Date:
- 2016-08
- Subjects:
- Obesity -- Urinary bladder -- Neurogenic -- Postoperative complications
Pediatric urology -- Periodicals
Urologic Diseases -- Periodicals
Urogenital Diseases -- Periodicals
Urologic Surgical Procedures -- Periodicals
Child
Infant
Urologie pédiatrique -- Périodiques
Appareil urinaire -- Maladies -- Périodiques
Pédiatrie
Urologie
Pediatric urology
Périodique électronique (Descripteur de forme)
Ressource Internet (Descripteur de forme)
Electronic journals
Periodicals
Electronic journals
618.926 - Journal URLs:
- http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/14775131 ↗
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/14775131 ↗
http://www.elsevier.com/journals ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1016/j.jpurol.2016.05.021 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 1477-5131
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 5030.285000
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 1350.xml