Thin strut bare metal stents in patients with atrial fibrillation: Is there still a need for BMS?. Issue 3 (9th December 2015)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Thin strut bare metal stents in patients with atrial fibrillation: Is there still a need for BMS?. Issue 3 (9th December 2015)
- Main Title:
- Thin strut bare metal stents in patients with atrial fibrillation: Is there still a need for BMS?
- Authors:
- Leschke, Matthias
Waliszewski, Matthias
Pons, Maxime
Champin, Stanislas
Nait Saidi, Lyassine
Mok Heang, Tay
Maskon, Oteh
Azman Bin Wan Ahmad, Wan
Herberger, Denny
Moulichon, Marc‐Eric
Rischner, Jérôme
Robin, Christophe
Leclercq, Florence
Peyre, Jean‐Pascal
Faurie, Benjamin
Schneider, André - Abstract:
- Abstract : Objectives: This observational study assessed the 9‐month clinical outcomes in an « all comers » population with a focus on patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) after thin strut bare metal stenting. Background: Drug eluting stent (DES) implantation is the treatment of choice for coronary artery disease (CAD) leaving only marginal indications for the use of bare metal stents (BMS). However, selected treatment populations with DES contraindications such as patients who cannot sustain 6–12 months of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) remain candidates for BMS implantations. Methods: Thin strut bare metal stenting in a priori defined subgroups were investigated in a non‐randomized, international, multicenter «all comers» observational study. Primary endpoint was the 9‐month TLR rate whereas secondary endpoints included the 9‐month MACE and procedural success rates. Results: A total of 783 patients of whom 98 patients had AF underwent BMS implantation. Patient age was 70.4 ± 12.8 years. Cardiovascular risk factors in the overall population were male gender (78.2%, 612/783), diabetes (25.2%, 197/783), hypertension (64.1%, 502/783), cardiogenic shock (4.9%, 38/783) and end stage renal disease (4.9%, 38/783). In‐hospital MACE was 4.1% (30/783) in the overall population. The 9‐month TLR rate was 4.5% (29/645) in the non‐AF group and 3.3% (3/90) in the AF group ( P = 0.613). At 9 months, the MACE rate in the AF‐group and non‐AF group was not significantly different eitherAbstract : Objectives: This observational study assessed the 9‐month clinical outcomes in an « all comers » population with a focus on patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) after thin strut bare metal stenting. Background: Drug eluting stent (DES) implantation is the treatment of choice for coronary artery disease (CAD) leaving only marginal indications for the use of bare metal stents (BMS). However, selected treatment populations with DES contraindications such as patients who cannot sustain 6–12 months of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) remain candidates for BMS implantations. Methods: Thin strut bare metal stenting in a priori defined subgroups were investigated in a non‐randomized, international, multicenter «all comers» observational study. Primary endpoint was the 9‐month TLR rate whereas secondary endpoints included the 9‐month MACE and procedural success rates. Results: A total of 783 patients of whom 98 patients had AF underwent BMS implantation. Patient age was 70.4 ± 12.8 years. Cardiovascular risk factors in the overall population were male gender (78.2%, 612/783), diabetes (25.2%, 197/783), hypertension (64.1%, 502/783), cardiogenic shock (4.9%, 38/783) and end stage renal disease (4.9%, 38/783). In‐hospital MACE was 4.1% (30/783) in the overall population. The 9‐month TLR rate was 4.5% (29/645) in the non‐AF group and 3.3% (3/90) in the AF group ( P = 0.613). At 9 months, the MACE rate in the AF‐group and non‐AF group was not significantly different either (10.7%, 69/645 vs. 6.7%, 6/90; P = 0.237). Accumulated stroke rates were 0.3% (2/645) in the non‐AF subgroup at baseline and 1.1% (1/90) in the AF subgroup ( P = 0.264). Conclusion: Bare metal stenting in AF patients delivered acceptably low TLR and MACE rates while having the benefit of a significantly shorter DAPT duration in a DES dominated clinical practice. © 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions. Volume 88:Issue 3(2016)
- Journal:
- Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions
- Issue:
- Volume 88:Issue 3(2016)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 88, Issue 3 (2016)
- Year:
- 2016
- Volume:
- 88
- Issue:
- 3
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2016-0088-0003-0000
- Page Start:
- 358
- Page End:
- 366
- Publication Date:
- 2015-12-09
- Subjects:
- bare metal stent -- atrial fibrillation -- TLR -- MACE -- all comers observational study
Heart -- Diseases -- Diagnosis -- Periodicals
Cardiac catheterization -- Periodicals
616.1207572 - Journal URLs:
- http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1002/(ISSN)1522-726X ↗
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/ ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1002/ccd.26261 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 1522-1946
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 3092.992000
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library STI - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 241.xml