ITRAQ as a method for optimization: Enhancing peptide recovery after gel fractionation. Issue 6 (18th February 2014)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Glibert, Pieter; Van Steendam, Katleen; Dhaenens, Maarten; Deforce, Dieter
• Is Part Of: Proteomics. Volume 14:Issue 6(2014:Mar.)
• Page Start: 680
• Page End: 684
• Publication Date: 2014-02-18
• Subjects: Gel fractionation -- In‐gel digestion -- iTRAQ -- Method optimization -- Quantification -- Technology; Proteins -- Separation -- Periodicals; Bioinformatics -- Periodicals; Proteomics -- Periodicals; Genomes -- Periodicals; Molecular genetics -- Periodicals; 572.605
• DOI: 10.1002/pmic.201300444
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1615-9853

Abstract

Abstract : At the dawn of a new era in label‐free quantitation on high‐resolution MS instruments, classical methods such as iTRAQ continue to provide very useful insights in comparative proteomics. The potential to multiplex samples makes this reporter‐based labeling technique highly suited for method optimization as demonstrated here by a set of standard series. Instead of studying ratios of annotated proteins, we propose an alternative method, based on the analysis of the average reporter ratios of all the spectra from a sample or a large distinct subset herein. This strategy circumvents the bias, associated with the annotation and iTRAQ quantitation, leading to increased adequacy in measuring yield differences between workflows. As gel electrophoresis prior to MS analysis is highly beneficial, for example, as a fractionation step, the approach was applied to evaluate the influence of several parameters of the established in‐gel digestion protocol. We quantified the negative effect of SYPRO Ruby staining and the positive effect of gel fixation prior to digestion on peptide yield. Finally, we emphasize the benefits of adding CaCl2 and ACN to a tryptic in‐gel digest, resulting in an up to tenfold enhanced peptide recovery and fewer trypsin missed cleavages.