Pilot study of once‐a‐day prophylaxis for youth and young adults with severe haemophilia A. (1st August 2016)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Crivianu‐Gaita, V.; Rivard, G. E.; Carcao, M.; Teitel, J.; St‐Louis, J.; Blanchette, V.; Pullenayegum, E.; Abad, A.; Feldman, B. M.
• Is Part Of: Haemophilia. Volume 22:Number 5(2016:Sep.)
• Page Start: e401
• Page End: e405
• Publication Date: 2016-08-01
• Subjects: factor VIII -- haemophilia A -- joint bleeds -- pilot study -- prophylaxis -- quality of life; Hemophilia -- Periodicals; 616.1572005
• DOI: 10.1111/hae.13058
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1351-8216

Abstract

Abstract : Introduction: Standard prophylaxis has been shown to be an effective treatment for severe haemophilia A. According to pharmacokinetic principles, daily factor infusions of smaller doses can maintain similar trough factor VIII (FVIII) levels, and perhaps the same protection as standard prophylaxis. Aim: This multicentre study examined the feasibility of daily prophylaxis for youth and young adults with severe haemophilia A in Montreal and Toronto. Methods: Bleeding rates, joint status, quality of life and physical activity were monitored for 14 patients during this study. At baseline, subjects continued their regular treatment regimen and switched to daily prophylaxis after 4 months; nine had begun daily prophylaxis before enrolment. Additional visits occurred at 8 and 12 months which included a physical examination, inhibitor testing, HJHS and FISH assessments, the CHO‐KLAT/Haemo‐QoL‐A and PDPAR. Treatment satisfaction was assessed using the Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication ver.II and perceived difficulty questions at the end of study. Results and conclusions: There were no significant changes in quality of life except for concerns with the demanding daily infusion schedule. The number of bleeds did not statistically differ from the initial 4 months of the study to the last 8 months. Monthly bleeding rates from the year prior to the study and during the intervention phase were not statistically different. It was also found that daily prophylaxis used 24% less FVIII compared to standard prophylaxis. Taking all of this into account, we have found that providing daily prophylaxis is feasible and that it is feasible to prospectively study daily prophylaxis in youth and young adults.