Rheology of polyacrylonitrile‐based precursor polymers produced from controlled (RAFT) and conventional polymerization: Its role in solution spinning. Issue 48 (19th August 2016)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Kaur, J.; Millington, K.; Cai, J.Y.
• Is Part Of: Journal of applied polymer science. Volume 133:Issue 48(2016)
• Page Start: n/a
• Page End: n/a
• Publication Date: 2016-08-19
• Subjects: flow -- polyacrylonitrile -- RAFT -- viscosity -- wet spinning; Polymers -- Periodicals; Polymerization -- Periodicals; 668.9
• DOI: 10.1002/app.44273
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0021-8995

Abstract

ABSTRACT: Polymer solutions in dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) as a solvent, made from reversible addition fragmentation chain transfer (RAFT)‐mediated polyacrylonitrile (RAFT ¥ PAN) terpolymer with molecular weight (MW) of 260, 000 g/mol and dispersity (Ð) of 1.29, behave differently under applied shear stress than polymer solutions made from conventional PAN (Control PAN) with similar MW (258, 000 g/mol) but Ð of 2.05 in the same solvent. The unique rheology of RAFT PAN is because of the reduced amount of high MW polymer fractions. Specifically, a 25% (w/v) polymer solution of RAFT PAN had a viscosity of 198 Pas while the equivalent control PAN polymer solution had a viscosity of 968 Pas at a shear rate of 1 s −1 . Also, RAFT PAN polymer solutions had a longer Newtonian plateau than control PAN polymer solutions. This exhibits more liquid character in RAFT PAN polymer solutions than control PAN polymer solutions at same temperature and concentration. In dynamic tests, RAFT PAN polymer solutions gelled slower than their equivalent control PAN polymer solutions because of their longer polymer chain relaxation times. Slow gelling and higher liquid character in RAFT PAN polymer solutions can result in obtaining stronger and finer precursor fibers during wet spinning. Since RAFT PAN polymer solutions exhibit low viscosity and higher liquid character when compared to its equivalent control PAN at same concentration and temperature, these can allow a wider working window for wet spinning and can also allow higher solid content in the polymer solutions that remain easy to wet spin. This is expected to lead to compact and finer fibers with less voids and higher strength. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J. Appl. Polym. Sci.2016, 133, 44273. Abstract :