Efficiency analysis of novel Liquid Organic Hydrogen Carrier technology and comparison with high pressure storage pathway. (26th October 2016)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Wang, Hewu; Zhou, Xin; Ouyang, Minggao
• Is Part Of: International journal of hydrogen energy. Volume 41:Number 40(2016)
• Page Start: 18062
• Page End: 18071
• Publication Date: 2016-10-26
• Subjects: Energy efficiency -- Energy flow -- Liquid Organic Hydrogen Carrier (LOHC) -- Hydrogen fuel cell vehicle; Hydrogen as fuel -- Periodicals; Hydrogène (Combustible) -- Périodiques; Hydrogen as fuel; Periodicals; 665.81
• DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2016.08.003
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0360-3199

Abstract

Abstract: Liquid Organic Hydrogen Carrier (LOHC) is under fundamental research in recent years as a potential hydrogen storage pathway for fuel cell vehicles. This report focuses on the energy efficiency of the LOHC supply system from centralized off-site hydrogenation to vehicle on-board dehydrogenation. In this paper, a system model using LOHC-based hydrogen storage/transport/supply is established, the energy flow is analyzed by calculating the energy consumptions in the steps of hydrogenation process, LOHC transport and dehydrogenation process. Based on physical properties and some experimental data, the energy efficiency and its variations along with the decrease of dehydrogenation capability and energy recycling are also simulated and compared with other commercialized hydrogen storage methods (high pressure or liquefied). It is found that the energy efficiency of the LOHC has a highest number of 69.17% and 88.74% with and without energy recycling respectively, and will reduce with the dehydrogenation capability decrease. The results also show that, the energy efficiency of LOHC technology is somewhat lower than those of 70 MPa and 35 MPa high-pressure storage methods. Compared with liquefied pathways, the LOHC efficiency is higher with energy recycling and a little lower without energy recycling. Highlights: LOHC pathway for FCEVs has a highest energy efficiency of 69.17%. Recycling hydrogenation released-heat could increase efficiency to 88.74%. Energy efficiency of LOHC reduces with dehydrogenation capability decrease. Energy efficiency of LOHC is lower than high-pressure storage pathways. Energy efficiency of LOHC is higher than liquid hydrogen storage pathway.